|
|
Post by chumley56 on Aug 23, 2023 17:47:15 GMT -6
88.2 here
|
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Aug 23, 2023 17:53:06 GMT -6
98.6 here.
|
|
|
|
Post by phdamage on Aug 23, 2023 18:01:58 GMT -6
I’m curious to try higher sample rates. I’ve been using 44.1/24 forever. I just worry about processing power as my track counts are pretty damn high these days - often pushing triple digits. Maybe will give it a go on a simple project coming up just for shits and giggles
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2023 18:25:12 GMT -6
I read a long time ago that some plug-ins work better at 96k. So, all my personal work is at 96k, but my professional work is at 48k, just for compatibility with friends whose gear is long in the tooth. Quick fix to this, don't use plugins.. Oh my, I'm beginning to sound like Eppstein. |
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Aug 23, 2023 18:49:07 GMT -6
Well that was a Taylor made response. John E. prefers the (George) Martin  approach, to better get an ovation. Chris |
|
|
|
Post by jampa on Aug 23, 2023 19:18:34 GMT -6
96k if me
Whatever it comes in as if not me
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Aug 23, 2023 19:31:42 GMT -6
Funny you should say that Shadow. Twelve years back when I was just starting to work in a DAW, a friend who is a major league engineer/producer with dozens of Grammy's and other awards came by to help me get started. First thing he did was remove 95% of my plug-ins, ha!
|
|
|
|
Post by bossanova on Aug 23, 2023 19:59:50 GMT -6
96 on vocals at minimum for peace of mind, but I could probably get away with 48. Like others have said, mostly for low latency and anti-aliasing.
|
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 23, 2023 20:15:55 GMT -6
I read a long time ago that some plug-ins work better at 96k. So, all my personal work is at 96k, but my professional work is at 48k, just for compatibility with friends whose gear is long in the tooth. Quick fix to this, don't use plugins.. Oh my, I'm beginning to sound like Eppstein. Has anyone seen my baby? It was in there with all that bath water. |
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Aug 23, 2023 21:35:07 GMT -6
I’ve gone around the horn several times on this. A definite difference to my ears through my RME. 24/88.2 is the most complimentary to my voice. 44.1 and 48 sound thinner and brighter, while 96 is really full but brings out more mids.
|
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Aug 23, 2023 21:36:42 GMT -6
OK Shadow. You're right.
Case closed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2023 21:37:40 GMT -6
Got you beat this one time only? |
|
|
|
Post by ab101 on Aug 23, 2023 21:58:16 GMT -6
88.2 or 96. I prefer 96 on tracking because of the latency issues.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackdawg on Aug 24, 2023 0:40:52 GMT -6
32b96k
and
32b384k
|
|
|
|
Post by theshea on Aug 24, 2023 1:49:58 GMT -6
I’ve gone around the horn several times on this. A definite difference to my ears through my RME. 24/88.2 is the most complimentary to my voice. 44.1 and 48 sound thinner and brighter, while 96 is really full but brings out more mids. what RME model? |
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Aug 24, 2023 2:29:11 GMT -6
Is this realbatsonline! Ok so my new 13900K uber ‘puter arrived so I can finally run projects at 48KHz 24bit instead of 44.1/24 But I’d be a liar if I said I can actually hear any difference in a double blind ABX (oh how I’d like to test some of you older high sample rate bats in a proper ABX :-) On paper apparently (according to the one and only Bob Katz) my HEDD 192 sounds better at 48 over 44.1 …. clearly he’s the head bat in the cave (I beg you Chris no puns  And now I’m moving to 48/24 of course I have a new issue that I’ll have to sample rate convert back to 44.1 for submission to CD Baby as the aggregator they require files at 44.1 which will possibly mitigate any benefits of recording at 48KHz - hopefully not. |
|
|
|
Post by itzprime on Aug 24, 2023 3:11:12 GMT -6
Did a few blindtests and null tests. Found out that if you record cleanly (with minimum distortion gear), then it doesn't make a noticable difference.
I mix with higher sample rates tho as aliasing especially with distortion plugin can be nasty.
|
|
|
|
Post by christophert on Aug 24, 2023 4:27:54 GMT -6
Yay
|
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Aug 24, 2023 10:21:19 GMT -6
I’ve gone around the horn several times on this. A definite difference to my ears through my RME. 24/88.2 is the most complimentary to my voice. 44.1 and 48 sound thinner and brighter, while 96 is really full but brings out more mids. what RME model? Multiface II |
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,103 
Member is Online
|
Post by ericn on Aug 24, 2023 10:29:17 GMT -6
I have found I don’t have a hard and fast rule, but I have noticed you can tell both AD and DA converters definitely show what they’re designers favorite sample rate is and Mytek definitely likes 96K.
|
|
approach,
