|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Nov 6, 2013 12:04:54 GMT -6
I agree about Streisand. A master vocalist. Perfect tone to her voice. Probably due to that big honker.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Nov 6, 2013 12:26:27 GMT -6
I think you're on to something cowboy, perfectly tuned, the vocal is more noticeable because it can't be perfectly aligned. it is in contrast. With tuning by ear, the imperfections leave a wider range of pitch frequency for any note, so the vocal blends more easily. I think that's why I don't mind just a pinch of vocal correction here and there, the vocal's not really off, in a way the tuning's too precise.
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Nov 6, 2013 13:06:58 GMT -6
Although "exact" tuning is also often dead incorrect, if you consult physics for your overtones. At least 11/12ths of the time. I think part of the danger is that we are becoming more attuned to singers singing in tempered tuning. Intonation is not "right/wrong"....in fact, if we are actually GOING to assign a dead scientific right or wrong, digital tuning algorithms are WRONG, as A is only 440 when it's the root. If you're in F major and Autotune moves the A you sing to 440, that's incorrect. I think part of the problem is that people are now hearing the human voice as a tempered instrument. It's not in nature. Ever. We used to rag (with love of course) the singers in school who spent too much time practicing scales to the piano--you could hear it. I find it ironic that we're now somehow idealizing that sound. You want to know why vocals were more compelling years ago? Because the human voice is more compelling than a tempered instrument to the masses. Precisely BECAUSE of the "flaws" everyone thinks they're correcting. Pitch IS part of the art of music. I find it tragic that we are removing and binding everything that IS art....music is time, timbre, tuning....at the most basic level. We all have different brains and ears that experience all of the above differently. We should embrace that rather than settling on some compromised "perfect" intonation and tempo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2013 13:36:19 GMT -6
Yepp. I have problems to understand the intention of the use of autotune in many productions. If it is used to fix what can be fixed and maybe should be fixed due to mentioned reasons, it should be most unobstructive, at best: unnoticable. As an unvaluable and clever tool, like editing always was. If it's used as an obvious effect, that should be clearly hearable as well and should not leave me with the impression i have to think about if this is really intended or just a poorly made fix. If you have a special voice, a sloppy expression or whatever and it meets the song or music, it should not be used at all just to make it sound more "polished" in a false impression it would sound more professional or perfect then. Autotune/Melodyne/v-vocal/whatever are clever tools that can be used as they were intended and abused for all kind of creative effects. But please not for something undefined in the middle.......... Tne Iron Chic example is a brutal thing to show how not to do it. What the hell is one thinking using autotune in a half-obvious way on a PUNK track? Ever heard Johnny Lydon, or what? Maybe one should remaster some Bob Dillon songs with Melodyne, oh my god, because he is so awfully out of tune? LOL. What the heck - a singer does not even have to be a good singer technically, he must not even stay in tune - as long as he is aware of it and finds ANY way to express himself amd finds his personal style and cultivates it. If a singer wants to be someone else without the skills to do this, this will not work, with or without autotune. What a kind of producer does such a thing like the Iron Chic stuff??? No matter how the voice tracks sounded before, it couldn't be worse than the result....
|
|
|
Post by scumbum on Nov 6, 2013 17:07:22 GMT -6
The Beatles would tune to the piano in the studio . So most of their stuff I try to play along with , after tuning my guitar with a tuner , is slightly off .
I was working on a cover of Please Please Me and its tuned in between E and Eb .
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Nov 6, 2013 18:37:16 GMT -6
Long ago I had an Autotune license....Like...crap WinXP? Maybe? It may have been 98 and the "gigastudio years". Version who teh F knows now...but, I bought it because it was all the rage--and you know what the only useful thing I ever found for it? REtuning samples of strings that had been tracked/edited to tempered pitch. It had an equal temperament setting--so, I would render the string line from Gigastudio as audio and then use Autotune to put each line into actual equal temperament.
Also, note about the Beatles reference--that may or may not be the case...not like I"m a Beatles fanatic, but if you listen to any recording done to analog tape--it was VERY regular practice to change the tape speed slightly for various reasons--but, right up into mix time-you could ever so slightly speed up the tape and tighten the low end...anyway-point being that you'll find a LARGE number of tape recordings are not consistent. Meaning song 1 on the album might be right on...and song two is a little higher. Song 3, they might've tuned down a half step for the singer...and then only brought it up a quarter tone to tighten the groove (yielding a flat by a quarter tone end result). Just saying--music of the first handful of decades of recording was much more of a continuum of overall pitch...and yes, tuning to the piano in the room (which can't be easily/quickly retuned) is another reason. Now, there's SO much done with digital synths and such and electronic tuners are everywhere...there's less variance. It's 99% of the time "on", in terms of the macro tuning.
I remember back in the day giving guitar lessons, I ALWAYS had to use a fixed bridge guitar for lessons, because you HAD to tune to the record the student brought. Now, like I said 99% of the time, you could tune to 440 and play along with the records. Even if they tune down a half step--that's JUST Eb, at the end of the day...unless they're playing a lot of open strings, you can just play that without tuning down--but, it's been a good while since I"ve picked up a guitar to play along with something and had to retune to the record. Not to mention that all but the best turntables and cassette decks would vary it yet again on the playback side. I think that "consistency" isn't a good thing. I think it makes more things sound subconsciously similar than they would otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Nov 6, 2013 22:35:01 GMT -6
The problem with tuning is that nothing but a synthesizer has ever really been equal tempered. Intonation is really about overtone alignment created by bending notes as opposed to matching fundamentals. Tuners also tend to never agree with each other. I actually think most of today's backing tracks are more out of tune than many were in the past. The only way I ever did it that seemed to work was to plug a mike into a strobe tuner in the control room that was visible from the studio. Then I'd tune the strobe tuner to a relevant note on the piano and have everybody tune to that same note with the rest being done by ear.
Another problem is that headphones screw up pitch perception in addition to the fact that intervals shrink as we turn up the volume. Another problem is the fact that Lexicon reverbs droop in pitch as you increase pre-dalay. Real plates and chambers with pre-delay really helped an overdubbing singer stay in tune but a couple bad lexicon experiences has shaken many a young singer's confidence. Even the most experienced pro studio singers will generally sing better to loudspeakers than to headphones. That's how most people overdubbed vocals prior to the mid '60s. Today people go crazy adding delay to try and match the sound of what was really bleed from the studio speaker.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Nov 7, 2013 8:38:28 GMT -6
Very interesting Bob. I wasn't aware of Lexicon's bending pitch. I use ReLab's LX480 plug in. It has a high def algorithm that wasn't on the original Lex, that I use exclusively, but the sim does have the original Lex verbs too. I wonder if the effect you mention happens within the plug. Also, when you mentioned headphones messing with pitch perception and intervals shrinking when headphone volume is raised, would you mind elaborating, I'd like to know a bit more about that. A good singer did a track a while back, and it seems pitchier than she usually sings, I wonder if these factors were at play. Thanks in advance..
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Nov 7, 2013 10:58:25 GMT -6
Singing in tune should not be a big deal. Out-O-Tune is very frequently fixing a bad headphone mix or out of tune elements in a backing track. Pitch perception is well known to change with volume but for some reason nobody teaches hearing to musicians. In an unamplified performance with an acoustical balance, pitch and dynamics both just take care of themselves. One of the side effects of being among the first to use all this technology is that we got to ask the question "what the f!uk is wrong?" when a good singer is suddenly going out of tune. This is a huge problem on stage. There's no better example than hearing an elderly singer go way off pitch at the Opry only to be right on the money an hour later down the road at the Midnight Jamboree with its early '70s PA system.
Naturally I learned about lexicons very much the hard way a couple years into using one. Real rooms don't modulate pitch but its a common way of covering up the shortcomings of digital reverb.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Nov 7, 2013 12:24:08 GMT -6
good stuff Mr Ohlsson!!
I'm working on DIY stainless plate, cold rolled plate, and 3 spring reverbs here, I also put a cheap condenser mic in my open garage attic, as far away from my (soundproofed studio) entry door as possible, i open the door, crank whatever, and it serves as a weak chamber, not too crazy, but still pretty cool, i control it by how far i open/close the solid core entry door. Although great for somethings, I've always heard something less than real with the emu's, but I was never able to pinpoint what bugged me, IMO an emu could never simulate the reality of a real space, like the real thing, for a multitude of different reasons. Real vs sim, all you have to do, is go listen to a real plate verb, in a nice studio, and my guess is you'll never brag about a plugin plate again.
as far as being in tune is concerned, i think the lack of understanding is another symptom of people never playing live, when you've been in dozens of different rooms, with bands that play at ultra high spl's, or really quiet, or you've struggled(mostly as a bass player) through a gig where you have "one note bass" going on, you learn real quick, that pitch is utterly relative lol
btw, i have a jim williams modded lexicon, sounds great for what it is.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Nov 7, 2013 14:38:15 GMT -6
check out 10:51 on..tuners be damned lol
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Nov 7, 2013 17:32:42 GMT -6
The only artist I've seen since him that can just do it is Ryan Adams, and it took 30 years for someone even close to that kind of talent to come along. The songs are just wonderful. Thanks for the reminder Tony.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Nov 7, 2013 19:39:23 GMT -6
The Beatles would tune to the piano in the studio . So most of their stuff I try to play along with , after tuning my guitar with a tuner , is slightly off . I was working on a cover of Please Please Me and its tuned in between E and Eb . Tape playback speed was often adjusted during mixing. Sometimes even on purpose, if it sounded better that way. (this is not news)
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Nov 7, 2013 21:12:49 GMT -6
if you listen to the abby road vocal tracks isolated(JK posted a few weeks ago) you can hear some buried chipmunk backing vocals, where they clearly slowed the tap down to get to those notes.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Nov 8, 2013 10:51:47 GMT -6
Tape playback speed was often adjusted during mixing. Sometimes even on purpose, if it sounded better that way. (this is not news) Actually it was not that common at the time of the Beatles. You needed to hook a tone oscillator up to a power amp and drive the capstan motor with it. This was the case until the very late 1960s. It was easier with 1/4 inch machines so this did happen some in mastering and was quite common beginning in the early '70s.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Nov 12, 2013 14:29:45 GMT -6
Well, I only started at this in the late 70s as a freshman in high school. By the time I got to my own studio in the late 80s, "vari-speed" was on all the decks I was working on. And we used it a lot!
|
|