|
|
Post by mrholmes on May 3, 2016 17:20:28 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by levon on May 3, 2016 23:16:06 GMT -6
I especially like your 'MUSIC IS FUN' sig under that graph.
|
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on May 5, 2016 3:00:03 GMT -6
To be fair, I think the situation hasn't really affected the bottom lines of most small time/independent artists and I couldn't care less what Taylor Swift's royalty cheques look like. I think it's maybe stressed a certain band of middle income artists who still pay for all the services of a label but don't get much/anything back in return, but I don't feel its hurting the artists in my area. On the contrary, we're in the middle of a cultural boom.
|
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on May 5, 2016 5:11:31 GMT -6
Can we get some labeling on that graph for what is what? One side is linear the other side is logarithmic...
|
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on May 5, 2016 21:28:29 GMT -6
The graph is using current industry econometrics, billions and millions mixed with algorithms and linear equations as devised by scientists working at Spotify and Warner Music Group.
|
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on May 6, 2016 7:02:56 GMT -6
Thanks, thats helpful...
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on May 9, 2016 21:23:59 GMT -6
What's a "Google Takedown"?
I'll say this, I just got $250 for a job that paid over $2,800 in the 80's and 90's, and I was grateful for the work. We've been screwed. Now, how do we fix it?
|
|
