|
Post by noah shain on Apr 20, 2016 9:22:56 GMT -6
Small note on what Noah was saying - how do you not hate the shit out of Microshifters? Every time I do it I turn it down so low I can't hear it or I turn it off. It always sounds bad to me. Me too! If you "hear" it it's too loud. It's the old "you can't hear it but if you MUTE it you miss it." Gotta find that sweet spot.
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on Apr 20, 2016 9:29:03 GMT -6
I definitely lean on delays more than reverbs for more modern styles. They also get heavily treated. I think its a big part of the elusive, giant, lush, evolving, wraparound thing...blend of the two.
|
|
|
Post by rocinante on Apr 20, 2016 9:42:48 GMT -6
I have been blending my outboard reverbs with my plugs to some satisfying results but i too am flying by the seat of my pants and never got a firm grip on reverbs. But currently i am using true verb with valahalla with a tc electronics for back up vox and acoustic guitar solos and its sounding pretty damn good. I need a better pc. I am actually actively looking to purchase one soon because i am having problems when too many verbs are applied. Forget about daisy chaining several of them. And often they're an effects send i patch too.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 14,952
|
Post by ericn on Apr 20, 2016 9:50:05 GMT -6
I definitely lean on delays more than reverbs for more modern styles. They also get heavily treated. I think its a big part of the elusive, giant, lush, evolving, wraparound thing...blend of the two. I read this and think TC 1290 and Eventide H3000! Great delays into stomp boxes can give you meaty yummy vocals if you don't push to hard, it's all about the sweet spot !
|
|
|
Post by svart on Apr 20, 2016 10:26:09 GMT -6
noah shain had a bunch of specific info, a few things that stuck out as items that I found helped me. I'll admit however this is something I still puzzle over and struggle with to do what I want and get sounds like what I hear from other people. First was EQ. Once I figured out I could heavily EQ my returns I started to make more progress. With EQ I'm able to get the reverb to disappear a bit more and become more of a pillow than a rock canyon. The other EQ trick noah mentioned is to EQ/filter the source and let the reverb run full spectrum. Depends on the sound you are after. But I was much happier with my reverbs when I started doing simple things to them with EQ. I tend to roll off quite a bit of lows and highs if I want something to just form a bit of room around the vocal and not actually stick out as a reverb. I also tend to layer two or three reverbs. I nearly always run a plate on the vocal. Unless I'm going for a very live plate sound I typically use the plate to thicken things a bit. Usually you can't really hear it much but it adds some tone and weight. Next I'll pick a room, I lean toward small to medium room sizes, but obviously if I want a vocal in a giant space that can change. I'll use the room to help set the environment. I'll tend to also send a few key melody elements (usually acoustic guitars, upright bass in what I'm doing) to this same room. I tend to EQ both the plate and the room a bit - dropping low end and depending if I want light or dark I'll be heavy handed on the highs as well. I'll also layer a hall into this mixture as well occasionally. As for level of all of this - that is to taste. Typically if I don't want to hate it later I'll do the bring it up until I can hear it and then drop it back a bit trick. I'll also put on some headphones and listen. For me I hear reverb better in the headphones, so I typically use them to help set my levels at the start and then quickly switch to my monitors once I've established my rough baseline of what I know is not too loud. Using other references (car, friends stereo...) is another way to check your levels. If you do that enough you quickly get the hang of what is too much and what is just right at least to your own personal preference. If you are trying to sound match some other recording then I'll bring that up and listen, and compare my results, usually I do that by just focusing on one small section of a piece. I'll also skip through presets and find something close and tweak it from there to make it work. However I have spent considerable time messing around with a few reverb plugin's trying to wrap my head around what is going on with all the controls. For me the plugin that seemed to click was the Exponential Audio stuff. I like and use both R2 and Phoenix quite a bit. I like their sounds, and I like the UI. I especially enjoy messing around with the early reflections, and to be able to visually see the representation just clicked in my head for some reason. Now Delays - man I struggle with them and I know many people use them all the time and they do it very well. noah had quite the list of delays in his post. I struggle with anything past the odd slap. ;-) This is good info!
|
|
|
Post by svart on Apr 20, 2016 10:27:40 GMT -6
Probably worth adding that I ALWAYS have a few delays going too. They're as big a part of the reverb as the reverb is. 1. dark 1/4 note mono delay with long feedback. 2. Thin, filtered 1/8 note delay with long repeats. 3. Big stereo 1/8 note delay with feedback 4. Big stereo 1/4 note delay with feedback and some kind of mod or evolving filter 5. Classic mono slap 6. Super short, super wide delay, no feedback. Like 1/32 note or 1/64 note. 7. Stereo spreader thing like little microshift or doubler 4. One side pitched up a couple cents, the other side down. Gentle mod. The old eventide trick. Only lead vocals here. 8. Another spreader thing. Thinner. For BG Vox and other stuff I wanna push outside the speakers. All my mixes have some amount of those time based effects on things to varying degrees. I think that stuff may play a role in getting big bad ass reverb sounds. 2 cents This is great info. It seems as I keep finding small bits of info from places, it always seems to include adding some delay with the reverb to some degree, which is something I've never really tried.
|
|
|
Post by zsarbomba on Apr 20, 2016 20:32:24 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on Apr 24, 2016 12:56:15 GMT -6
I realized when I was working on this mix last Thursday that I was using just about all the stuff I described in my earlier post so I figured I'd let you guys listen to it if you care to. www.hightail.com/download/ZWJVZUNwMHdubHpyZHNUQwThis is unmastered but it's squashed pretty good. Don't flame me, it's what's required in this world! I didn't record the vocal and it was a pretty god awful recording. Insane amount of auto tune too. Garbly artifacts and everything. Par for the course. It's a major label release and I can totally get in trouble for putting it up. Don't tell anyone!
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on Apr 24, 2016 18:55:54 GMT -6
I would really like to learn how those guys I named above make it sound like the dynamic range on every instrument has like 3db. Seriously, it's like even tho a drum fill might be performed super quiet (like brushes playing a cymbal roll), it's just as loud coming out of the speakers as another phrase that was played FFF by the drums. How do they do that? It's definitely not compression because it sounds like they just set the levels for each musical phrase (not each track) so they sit between -3 and -6 on an RMS meter or something... I don't know... I can't figure it out, but I want to know how they do it. *cough cough*
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Apr 24, 2016 22:15:28 GMT -6
I would really like to learn how those guys I named above make it sound like the dynamic range on every instrument has like 3db. Seriously, it's like even tho a drum fill might be performed super quiet (like brushes playing a cymbal roll), it's just as loud coming out of the speakers as another phrase that was played FFF by the drums. How do they do that? It's definitely not compression because it sounds like they just set the levels for each musical phrase (not each track) so they sit between -3 and -6 on an RMS meter or something... I don't know... I can't figure it out, but I want to know how they do it. *cough cough* can you explain this a bit? i don't quite understand what you mean by "it sound like the dynamic range on every instrument has like 3db." A really great way to understand reverb and the way sound travels is to go to a busy place, and listen(easy for you in NYC Chuck!), check out people as they're walking and talking, or traffic coming down a street, listen to what happens to the freqs as they approach, and as they leave, source interaction with environment etc, understand the way frequencies behave in the real world, and it becomes much easier to manipulate them in your mix, one of the reasons people are never happy with their reverb choices is because detailing what we hear is totally fleeting, which is weird considering how badass we are at understanding it instinctually, if we didn't we'd have been dinosaur food long ago 8)
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Apr 24, 2016 22:47:09 GMT -6
I'm sure I have much to learn about improving my reverb effects, but I'll say this, when I used hardware, this wasn't an issue. At that time I always used a Lexicon delay and Lexicon reverb on vocals. Now instead of hardware, I have plug-ins, the Relab XL480, the UAD EMT-140, Ocean Way Studios, and four or five other verbs. Using the hardware, reverb settings never seemed difficult to get to sound right at all.
My recent reverb setup is I put everything through the UAD Ocean Way plug on a bus, then to the Relab. I have the EMT 140 plate set up third in line, but only use it sparingly and at low level for vibe. I EQ the verbs, and use a fairly high level of pre-delay on vocals.
Where my tracks fall short is the room I'm in sucks. A great mic helps though, as I was lucky enough to have the $3,500 Soyuz 0-17 to use on one of my recent recordings, and it wasn't as difficult to get the reverb to feel right.
Around two years ago, my engineer/producer friend Jay Messina stopped by my place. He just tweaked a few settings on the Relab XL480, and my track instantly sounded better. So one part of the answer to the original question has to be that years of experiences lead to knowing what choices to make when choosing from all the variables in the reverb settings. His years of experience made a tricky thing look easy.
|
|
|
Post by zsarbomba on Apr 25, 2016 4:20:25 GMT -6
Seriously if you want your artificial verbs to sound realistic on material that has been recorded bone dry instinct tells me you had better get your head around the science of reverberation, echo and slap. Not only how it occurs naturally, but how it is achieved artificially. This would be my number one goal in the pursuit of artificial reverb and ambiance creation.
The thing is during the great recording Era the rooms where captured and when a plate was added for example, this just made the icing on the cake sound out of this world. And it was soooo simple to do..
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Apr 25, 2016 8:17:50 GMT -6
Had a mono room mic and a close mic for the vocal session yesterday. LDC up close in cardioid, room mic was an LDC in omni. With a setup that nice sounding, who needs a reverb bus?
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Apr 25, 2016 9:29:32 GMT -6
Yep, if the room sounds good, there is no need in some situations.
I doubt there was any reverb on most Sinatra recordings in the 40's and 50's. I don't know about the sixties. My guess is they'd have used a plate then.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Apr 25, 2016 9:37:15 GMT -6
One of the guys posted this link in a thread. I watched it and thought it was a fantastic tip to clean up reverbs. cfzrfegj.megaph.com
|
|
|
Post by jimwilliams on Apr 26, 2016 14:07:38 GMT -6
Choice? Bricasti M7. Cost? high, but better than 25 years ago.
One of my fav tricks with it is to use secondary room mics for the reverb sends. When the reverb source/sends are difuse, it adds more ooze and takes that "dry source send" sound off.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Apr 28, 2016 8:31:55 GMT -6
Bumping this thread.
I am a primitive reverb user. I instantiate one IR, usually one of those M7 emulations (small wood room, I think), and push everything into it, as if every instrument is in that space. It is not sufficient, and I welcome comments discussing a more enlightened approach to reverberation. My genre would be considered classic Rock these days (sadly) with an emphasis on explosive drums. Think John Henry Bonham, and go no further. I know it's an impossible dream, recreating the Zeppelin vibe, but there it is. BFD3 and the Love Kit point you in the right direction, now if I can only imbue my drummer with JHB's spirit. So, I've scheduled a seance prior to tonight's session. But I digress.
|
|
|
Post by gouge on Apr 29, 2016 4:07:12 GMT -6
cool thread.
I have had the same feeling as svart that no matter what I did it never sounded like the pros. more recently things are changing and I'm feeling more satisfied.
my setup is as follows.
d1500/sde1000 l/r delay buss rumour on tiled room v-verb got noisey so not using it. tc m2000 on vocal preset mangler into Demeter spring reverb spx990 arena setting
I've tried so many combinations, moved stuff around and finally seem to have settled on a good combination for now. first thing seemed to be getting all of the other instruments and specifically drums sorted. once I got the instruments sounding coherent and in the same space then the vocals sat better.
with the drums. the tails of the drum reverb need to be heard or the vocals become too obvious. the more drum reverb the more vocal reverb I can use. now I split the kit across 3 busses.
buss one has a dbx160sl for kick, snare, toms. channel aux is the spring reverb to snare and some arena. then the overheads go to buss 2 with a fet compressor. I push the overheads 100% through the aux spring reverb and use the fet bus to reinforce the reverb return. this was a big break through. it finally got me the shimmer I wanted after years of eq, comp, failures. then on buss 3 is the room mics crushed which I increase or decrease depending on song.
now my drums feel real, and the tails sit with the vocal tails.
another break through was my vocal setup.
I split the vocal.
ch1 is the main channel and has some tied room on the aux and some delay. ch2 is the reverb channel. I use hp/lp on the channel then use all of the aux channels, arena, spring, m2000, etc. get a big wet sound going. then I ride the ch2 fader to add or take away reverb. I can mix both channels and get the sound I'm chasing. in quiet patches I also ride the wet ch2 fader to remove verb so it doesn't sound too much when everything else goes quiet. this makes it easy to control. one fader only to move.
the other thing that made a big difference was to automate and compress the vocal. other wise the peaks in volume push the reverbs too hard and make them stand out in odd spots.
still learning tho, now I'm starting to dig into the guitars more and explore their space.
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on Apr 29, 2016 6:22:34 GMT -6
can you explain this a bit? i don't quite understand what you mean by "it sound like the dynamic range on every instrument has like 3db." I'm talking about the perceived loudness of the instruments. this has nothing to do with reverb. I was saying that the dynamic range of an instrument's performance in the mix is really small, like 3db. it didnt' matter if the drumset was playing ppp during a verse and then went FFF during the chorus. if you pulled up a volume meter on the drums alone, both types of playing would sit between 0 and -3 on the VU meter. How do mixers do that and not make it sound compressed?
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Apr 29, 2016 14:53:25 GMT -6
can you explain this a bit? i don't quite understand what you mean by "it sound like the dynamic range on every instrument has like 3db." I'm talking about the perceived loudness of the instruments. this has nothing to do with reverb. I was saying that the dynamic range of an instrument's performance in the mix is really small, like 3db. it didnt' matter if the drumset was playing ppp during a verse and then went FFF during the chorus. if you pulled up a volume meter on the drums alone, both types of playing would sit between 0 and -3 on the VU meter. How do mixers do that and not make it sound compressed? To me, it starts with whats tracked.. if a player is good, the consistency is there. If not, and that is mostly what I deal with... volume levelling is a good place to start. Automate, the unprocessed audio, get it close enough that when you follow it with a compressor (for tone, envelope shaping, and some control) that you get the dynamic range you desire. Imagine a bass player , a really good one, on a good instrument.. he plays an open E followed by a fretted B on the 4th string. You are tracking him, and on your VU meters both look the same and sound the same to you, in terms of volume. You now put a LA2A on that, and have 1-2 dB of compression and get the sound you want. Substitute good bass player for me... 8) I now hit the B note 6dB louder than the E. Put the same compressor on , different result in terms of level and sound. So, after you have slapped me around the head, and found that I just can't do better, what do you do....? Automate the second note, then put the LA2A on it It still won't sound like the good player, but it will be better. Do this with vocals, and do it first by whole section, VERSE CHORUS. Then by Line Then by word Then by syllable and then you will have the perfect vocal Snare and Kick, are tough too.... Best way to handle this, plug in... Drum Leveller.. almost magic.. and great for reducing bleed Manually, always record single hits of the drums when you have done your last take, and when mixing run off those hit... that way you can manually replace the hits and not use someone else's drum sounds.. I generally do just one level of kick A few of snare, sidestick, grace, Rimshot, centre hit soft medium and loud Cymbals toms rides etc You can replace them manually or use something like logics drum replacement, slates trigger etc Bass, you can also manually edit the volume or copy notes from another section Basically, if the dynamic range is such in the tracking, because of the players lack of control ... thats how I have learned to deal with it. hope that helps bud cheers Wiz
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2016 17:15:57 GMT -6
Yep, if the room sounds good, there is no need in some situations. I doubt there was any reverb on most Sinatra recordings in the 40's and 50's. I don't know about the sixties. My guess is they'd have used a plate then. Mainly chambers by the early sixties--perhaps even a bit earlier. Those recordings were done at Capitol. Those chambers (8 of 'em) are still in use today and they sound really nice!
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on Apr 30, 2016 22:11:22 GMT -6
Yep, if the room sounds good, there is no need in some situations. I doubt there was any reverb on most Sinatra recordings in the 40's and 50's. I don't know about the sixties. My guess is they'd have used a plate then. Mainly chambers by the early sixties--perhaps even a bit earlier. Those recordings were done at Capitol. Those chambers (8 of 'em) are still in use today and they sound really nice! I have had various friends work there over the years. I've taken some stuff (vocals and strings) over there and recorded the chambers a couple times. They're really nice. On strings they're pretty gorgeous...and familiar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2016 8:28:02 GMT -6
I have had various friends work there over the years. I've taken some stuff (vocals and strings) over there and recorded the chambers a couple times. They're really nice. On strings they're pretty gorgeous...and familiar. I've actually been in the chambers once. It was 6-7 years ago and was quite a rare treat. They go under the parking lot and are often too hot for any sort of extended visit (and the ladder is a bit of an adventure). Decor is minimal, as you might expect. But it's amazing how live they are and how long the decay times can be in such small spaces. I did notice an old plate in the anteroom--I assume it was a 140--but I don't know if it was in use or not. As a sidenote, that old plate reminded me of how many hidden treasure troves there are around L.A. A few years back I was visiting a large post house that had recently changed hands. On the tour, we went through one storeroom that was stacked floor-to-ceiling with dusty old processors. I remember seeing lots of dbx compressors from back in the day. Nobody knew how many of these boxes--if any--still worked. It was probably not worth anybody's time (there is no spare time in post) to go through and see if there were any keepers. It would be a field day for vintage gear lovers.
|
|
|
Post by noah shain on May 1, 2016 17:58:37 GMT -6
I have had various friends work there over the years. I've taken some stuff (vocals and strings) over there and recorded the chambers a couple times. They're really nice. On strings they're pretty gorgeous...and familiar. I've actually been in the chambers once. It was 6-7 years ago and was quite a rare treat. They go under the parking lot and are often too hot for any sort of extended visit (and the ladder is a bit of an adventure). Decor is minimal, as you might expect. But it's amazing how live they are and how long the decay times can be in such small spaces. I did notice an old plate in the anteroom--I assume it was a 140--but I don't know if it was in use or not. As a sidenote, that old plate reminded me of how many hidden treasure troves there are around L.A. A few years back I was visiting a large post house that had recently changed hands. On the tour, we went through one storeroom that was stacked floor-to-ceiling with dusty old processors. I remember seeing lots of dbx compressors from back in the day. Nobody knew how many of these boxes--if any--still worked. It was probably not worth anybody's time (there is no spare time in post) to go through and see if there were any keepers. It would be a field day for vintage gear lovers. That's amazing. LA is SATURATED with incredible studios and gear collections. There used to be a studio on Lankershim in the valley called ecstasy. Owned by an eccentric millionaire. I remember walking in to the tech shop and noticing 100s of 1073 channels in PILES on the bench. The bench was probably 20' long. Then dozens of vintage synths, piles of 1176s, LA2As, 3As and on the floor...yes, piled up haphazardly on the FLOOR...at least 8 fairchilds. The mic locker was out of control. Dozens and dozens of vintage German and US made classics. Had to be a million bucks worth of mics. It went on and on. Guitars, amps, drums, outboard, keyboards, etc...almost sickening. Craziest part was...no outside clients. The owner's music only. You guys are gonna think I'm making this up but it's true. He had been on the same record for years...and all they were doing, in 2 different SSL rooms was comping vocals. 2 full time, 8 hour a day, engineers and 2 assistants. Comping vocals on the same dozen songs...FOR YEARS!!!! Insane. Studio has changed hands. They put a million in it and it's fully cranking now.
|
|
|
Post by NoFilterChuck on May 1, 2016 21:45:03 GMT -6
Craziest part was...no outside clients. The owner's music only. You guys are gonna think I'm making this up but it's true. He had been on the same record for years...and all they were doing, in 2 different SSL rooms was comping vocals. 2 full time, 8 hour a day, engineers and 2 assistants. Comping vocals on the same dozen songs...FOR YEARS!!!! Oh, so you visited where they cut that Guns N Roses record Axl spent 10 years on, eh?
|
|