|
Post by swurveman on Jun 26, 2015 10:43:07 GMT -6
I have around 4K to spend right now, but am finding it hard to pull the trigger. I am curious what people's thought process is as you decide on which piece of gear to buy. We can't afford all we want at one time. However, when we have some money we all want to spend it on what's gonna give us the biggest bang for the buck.
Here are my contenders:
1. GML 8200 (Got a C2 on my Mix Bus. Do a lot of local and self mastering and am interested in mastering. Wanna finish the chain with a great EQ that's gonna also hold or expand its value over time.) 2. Custom Shop Les Paul (Got a Tele and Strat. Wanna fill out the lineup with one more of the essentials for layering guitars.) 3. Moog Little Phatty + Korg Kronos or Yamaha Motif ( Quality synths to replace/augment my midi keyboard and NI soft synths) 4. 4K worth of 500 series hardware EQ's: (Improve my individual channel sounds with hardware EQ's to replace software EQ's. 5. Burl B2 + Dangerous 2-Bus Lt: ( Mix depth, separation and mojo with Burl and Dangerous)
If anybody wants to talk about their thought process when they are about to pull the trigger, I'd appreciate it! I'm trending towards #1, #4 or #5, because I only have 2 hardware EQ's and haven't gone into the summing/high end converter world yet. Probably the best piece of gear from an investment standpoint is the GML, which I think is going to be one of those vintage pieces that grows in value over time.
Thanks to anyone who replies!
Frank
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Jun 26, 2015 11:14:22 GMT -6
How important is recall? Are you mostly working on the music of others or yourself?
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Jun 26, 2015 11:19:47 GMT -6
just curious why you aren't thinking about the Silver Bullet ?
|
|
|
Post by jfoc on Jun 26, 2015 11:23:42 GMT -6
I just picked up a mint condition 20 year old G&L ASAT classic (tele) for $600 off of gtr cntrs used site to round out my stable. If you buy off brand & used your money can go really far.
I bet one of the MIA Hamer LP style guitars would sound great & cost alot less than a comparable gibson
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Jun 26, 2015 11:28:48 GMT -6
How important is recall? Are you mostly working on the music of others or yourself? Mostly myself. So, recall is not time sensitive.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Jun 26, 2015 11:33:02 GMT -6
just curious why you aren't thinking about the Silver Bullet ? What's the price? I went to the website and it says $0.00
|
|
|
Post by mdmitch2 on Jun 26, 2015 11:43:01 GMT -6
Silver Bullet will be under $2,000 -- but official price hasn't been announced. If you're interested in the gml 8200, there's a new Sontec 500 series DIY option from the guy behind the highly regarded Don Classics units... groupdiy.com/index.php?topic=59638.0Kit should be available soon according to the thread above.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Jun 26, 2015 12:38:02 GMT -6
How important is recall? Are you mostly working on the music of others or yourself? Mostly myself. So, recall is not time sensitive. I would pick #1. I guess I like the idea of the GML 8200 here. I've used the 8200 and though it was a boss hog of an EQ. Really, really, really nice eq that would round out your master buss. #2, I think the Les Paul would be a bad value for that kind of money. You couple probably buy a less expensive Paul that you'd be happy with that would leave budget for other pieces of gear. #3, I'm not a synth guy, so I'm not going to comment there. #4, I feel like the value isn't very strong with 500 series eq's. I think you could get as much or more bang for the buck buying rackmount gear. Stereo units or even single channels. #5, You seem to have good converters, so I'm not sure how much of an increase in quality would bring to the table. Other scenarios that I would look at... Hopefully, you're buying used to maximize value. Perhaps a stereo Pultec style EQ (I have a Summit EQP-200 that I love) and a second EQ known for the mids. You might be able to swing a stereo Summit and a Massive Passive if you find solid prices on both. A stereo Summit with an API 5500 would probably be a nice pair too and leave ~$1000 in your account to put towards a Les Paul or something else. ...or buy my NTI eq listed in the link below.
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Jun 26, 2015 13:07:48 GMT -6
Mostly myself. So, recall is not time sensitive. I would pick #1. I guess I like the idea of the GML 8200 here. I've used the 8200 and though it was a boss hog of an EQ. Really, really, really nice eq that would round out your master buss. #2, I think the Les Paul would be a bad value for that kind of money. You couple probably buy a less expensive Paul that you'd be happy with that would leave budget for other pieces of gear. #3, I'm not a synth guy, so I'm not going to comment there. #4, I feel like the value isn't very strong with 500 series eq's. I think you could get as much or more bang for the buck buying rackmount gear. Stereo units or even single channels. #5, You seem to have good converters, so I'm not sure how much of an increase in quality would bring to the table. Other scenarios that I would look at... Hopefully, you're buying used to maximize value. Perhaps a stereo Pultec style EQ (I have a Summit EQP-200 that I love) and a second EQ known for the mids. You might be able to swing a stereo Summit and a Massive Passive if you find solid prices on both. A stereo Summit with an API 5500 would probably be a nice pair too and leave ~$1000 in your account to put towards a Les Paul or something else. ...or buy my NTI eq listed in the link below. Thanks for your thoughts. Yeah, the 8200 is really tempting both from a fidelity and investment perspective. Interesting that you don't think 500 series EQ's won't hold their value. I am it seems one of the few people who never went the 500 series route. So, my only experience is with the Vintech's 573 preamp and the minute my former partner heard my rackmount X73i's he never used the 573 again.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Jun 26, 2015 13:44:54 GMT -6
My 2 cents, If you're planning on top flight productions, go #4(not just 500 series stuff though), improving your individual tracks and sub mixes is the absolute ticket IMO, I'm pals with a couple multi platinum selling AE's, and exactly neither of them mix with something sitting on the 2 buss or master their own work, the whole 2 buss farce is mostly a contrived GS internet fallacy that is tantamount to putting the cart before the horse, the 2 is territory best left alone for a badass mastering engineer, and unless you have a ton of experience and a minimum of $50k to spend for a perfect room and medium level mastering gear, there is someone out there with a fresh perspective, and who is better suited for mastering at $100 or less per track, i would put your $ where you can achieve the most bang for your buck, in a real world no BS sense. If you want to play with new toys, that's a different story altogether, if you're a clip the converter guy? well then... have fun 8)
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Jun 26, 2015 13:46:40 GMT -6
I would pick #1. I guess I like the idea of the GML 8200 here. I've used the 8200 and though it was a boss hog of an EQ. Really, really, really nice eq that would round out your master buss. #2, I think the Les Paul would be a bad value for that kind of money. You couple probably buy a less expensive Paul that you'd be happy with that would leave budget for other pieces of gear. #3, I'm not a synth guy, so I'm not going to comment there. #4, I feel like the value isn't very strong with 500 series eq's. I think you could get as much or more bang for the buck buying rackmount gear. Stereo units or even single channels. #5, You seem to have good converters, so I'm not sure how much of an increase in quality would bring to the table. Other scenarios that I would look at... Hopefully, you're buying used to maximize value. Perhaps a stereo Pultec style EQ (I have a Summit EQP-200 that I love) and a second EQ known for the mids. You might be able to swing a stereo Summit and a Massive Passive if you find solid prices on both. A stereo Summit with an API 5500 would probably be a nice pair too and leave ~$1000 in your account to put towards a Les Paul or something else. ...or buy my NTI eq listed in the link below. Thanks for your thoughts. Yeah, the 8200 is really tempting both from a fidelity and investment perspective. Interesting that you don't think 500 series EQ's won't hold their value. I am it seems one of the few people who never went the 500 series route. So, my only experience is with the Vintech's 573 preamp and the minute my former partner heard my rackmount X73i's he never used the 573 again. the capi stuff is insane value to performance ratio imo. Just get a good iron and go!
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Jun 26, 2015 14:14:05 GMT -6
My 2 cents, If you're planning on top flight productions, go #4 (not just 500 series stuff though), improving your individual tracks and sub mixes is the absolute ticket IMO, Thanks for your reply Tony. What would you recommend for $4K worth of channel hardware EQ's? Currently, I only have four Vintech X73i's for mono channel EQ's. I typically output mono channels to stereo Aux/Groups-though I do use mono Aux/Groups for kick and snare that I then send to the Drum Aux/Group- and then everything is sent out to the Main Out.
|
|
|
Post by odyssey76 on Jun 26, 2015 14:22:09 GMT -6
Of course everyone would do something different if we all had 4k to spend but of all your options I would go with the GML 8200. I've had the pleasure of using one and it has ruined all other subtractive EQ's hardware and software since. Like Tony's saying, the 2 bus shouldn't really be a priority unless you have everything else in place BUT.....if you're a mastering engineer you have to have 2 bus gear right? That 8200 is phenomenal on individual tracks for mixing as well. I've never used an EQ that could pull out the bad frequencies so precisely without touching the rest of the tone of that particular track. You can fix so much which is helpful if you're mixing tracks which you didn't record. Plus, you won't lose money if you have to sell.....
|
|
|
Post by swurveman on Jun 26, 2015 14:53:27 GMT -6
Of course everyone would do something different if we all had 4k to spend but of all your options I would go with the GML 8200. I've had the pleasure of using one and it has ruined all other subtractive EQ's hardware and software since. Like Tony's saying, the 2 bus shouldn't really be a priority unless you have everything else in place BUT.....if you're a mastering engineer you have to have 2 bus gear right? That 8200 is phenomenal on individual tracks for mixing as well. I've never used an EQ that could pull out the bad frequencies so precisely without touching the rest of the tone of that particular track. You can fix so much which is helpful if you're mixing tracks which you didn't record. Plus, you won't lose money if you have to sell..... Thanks for your reply Justin. I think the video below that Mr. Massenburg did showcasing the 8200 is one of the coolest demo's I've ever seen. And, contrary to some opinions of its value it seems that many engineers have used the 8200 on their mix buses over the years and still do.
|
|
|
Post by b1 on Jun 26, 2015 15:17:15 GMT -6
Man, that would be sweet, but for $4,000.+ for the one from Spain on eBay, for my money (short of winning the Lottery), I would concentrate on the rest of the signal chain, starting at tracking & mixing - as Tony mentioned. Getting lovely tracks at the get-go will go a long way for Bob to finish the task for the crazy low price per song.
As for the Les Paul, that would be nice, but not much bang for the buck. Get a decent solidly built guitar and have a Luthier sweeten the action and hardware. There are some great lower price ones out there. I wouldn't turn a Custom Paul down, but I shy away from the overpriced sticker. If you are into DIY guitar, USA Custom guitars has a lot of satisfied customers who take pride in what they have, plus, Tommy is as nice and serviceable as all get out.
As for the Synth, The ones you mentioned would be nice, but there are some used or cheaper that will do nicely with per note after-touch and other bells and whistles - unless you are mainly a Keyboardist.
$4,000, doesn't go far unless you spend judiciously.
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Jun 26, 2015 16:07:02 GMT -6
I've owned all three synths you listed and all three are underwhelming for making music. For about the same price ($1400) you can score a nice Moog Source. There's a big difference going analog and vintage Moog. I've owned a number of vintage Moogs, absolutely no problems with maintenance etc and the sounds just contribute more than any outboard gear to the process of creating songs. Much like an amazing guitar or acoustic piano. Can't go wrong with a 70s/80s Les Paul either. Maybe a Rhodes?
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Jun 26, 2015 16:18:33 GMT -6
The 8200 is just awesome, I'm a huge GM fan! To answer ur earlier q, for me, I'd see about getting someone to build u some Capi lc53a's, some TB audio API style eq's and some Ez1084s( bluezzy GDIY), u could acquire quite a few top shelf eq's for $4k!
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jun 26, 2015 16:25:55 GMT -6
For 500 EQ's go with the classics - API 550A, Avidis E27. Classics and they will hold their value.
|
|
|
Post by jayson on Jun 26, 2015 17:13:30 GMT -6
I don't think you'll regret anything on your list - otherwise they wouldn't have made the list in the first place...and I could think of quite a few more if you want suggestions! Who doesn't enjoy hypothetically spending other peoples money? But at the end of the day the important question is what do you think you need most in your situation?
For me gear purchases are pretty much always generated by some kind of need. A noticeable deficiency in my workflow that makes itself obvious. As I work there's always an inevitable itch in the instruments or signal chain somewhere that needs to be scratched and that sets the course for what my next purchase decision turns into and what kind of priority it has. If I can get "need" and "want" to coincide that's a big bonus!
$4K could certainly get you a lot of bang for the buck in 500 series stuff; especially if you do any DIY. If had $4k to toss into my system now I'd be looking at a bunch of AML, CAPI and Analog Allstars kits, along with the less sexy, "gotta do" kind of items like patchbays and furniture. But that's just me; in my situation those are the things that are rising to the top of the priority list.
You know your situation best; I'm betting you already know the answer. Let us know what you decide!
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Jun 26, 2015 17:32:37 GMT -6
keep saving!
lots of different stuff on that list, from GML 8200 to Les Paul... sounds a bit like the money is burning a hole in your pocket 8)
When you start spending chunks of change at 2K and over, I reckon USED (for the value equation) or USED and CLASSIC for the resale equation.
Either spend money, basing it on the fact that you are buying a "consumable" that you need to run your business... e.g. plug ins, software, perhaps a fretless bass guitar for an upcoming album project.
Or, "invest" in things that you would love to have, and add value to your experience of making music or client base.. e.g. U47 C12 KM84 LA2A DBX160 1073 1084 33609
Honestly, keep saving, rent what you need if you can (if I could I would rent a shit load, but I live in the audio gear rental equivalent of nowhere)
either the 4 grand makes you money or makes you happy 8)
cheers
Wiz
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jun 26, 2015 17:39:57 GMT -6
GML is an eq regarded for its super tight lows, but for general work I would think DMG Equilibrium combined with either a Sontec for smooth curves and the 12.8k sheen or a Massive Passive for mids especially on vocals and elsewhere would go further.
BTW I just got one of those Warm Pultecs and quality wise it's pretty much as good as any of my more expensive gear.
The Moog Sub 37 is what I would get over the Little Phatty. But there are a lot of vintage synths to consider too that sound great (e.g. Juno 60, Prophet 600). And the reissue Odyssey sounds pretty close to the old one. But all that depends on the sound you're after.
4. is to me a big waste of money. Frankly I don't get the point of transparent summing mixers and the Burl stuff is a little overkill when you can just combine Capi or anything with transformers with your normal converters. That money would be enough to get a vintage rack mixer or a bunch of compressors or mics that can do things that have a lot more general utility.
Custom Les paul... a nice used Les Paul + Lollars or another boutique set would be a lot cheaper and probably sound and play better. And you'd have money left over for another amp.
|
|
|
Post by jazznoise on Jun 27, 2015 5:12:14 GMT -6
+1 on a used Les Paul or a cheaper equivalent. From what I've heard about the quality control the current Gibsons are robbery.
Synths are always fun. The Korg series are great hard to argue with the MS-20 for bang for buck, the Moog Sub 37 looks good and I've listened to a few nice reviews. Might be worth considering some of Dave Smith or Blofeld's stuff too
|
|
|
Post by Randge on Jun 27, 2015 8:53:49 GMT -6
For 500 series eq's, few can hang with the RTZ 1549. They are my go to's and I am getting more soon. Open, airy for clear and detailed sounds and tight when you want those punchy toms or snares. They really carve well for singers with odd voices. For $4,000, you can have 5 of them. About the only eq I haven't compared them to are the Avedis 27's. I hear those are really great as well and I may eventually get a pair. My next purchases after the 1549's will be a Hippo comp, as I need some stereo comps for mix inserts, and those sound great. I really got to try them a lot and really dug them. To my ears, they sound better than the other SSL style comps being sold. Serpent Audio is on my radar also. Thought their LA-3 and 4001 sound like comps that would get a lot of use here. I did take advantage of the DBX super sale on their 560's and scored a pair. Anyway, lots of good gear that I believe will hold their value and are built to the highest of quality now. Jeff's 526's should be something to consider as well. $4,000 can go a long ways to having quite a bit of new gear. That can get you 5 built 526's. It can also buy you one very nice piece from many top makers. So, look at your needs vs wants and see if getting several pieces would help your workflow better allowing more creative options, or if some heavy lifting from one piece is more to your suiting at the time. It certainly depends on what you are doing musically as to what you buy. If I didn't have commercial clients, I would have chose my purchased gear differently. I would have made two very different sounding stereo chains and concentrated on 2-buss pieces first.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jun 27, 2015 9:18:30 GMT -6
Here's what I do..
I keep some money aside for studio needs. When I'm in sessions and find something I need, I get it.
I've stopped attempting to guess what I'll need or use in the future, because I've almost always been wrong! I've always had eyes bigger than my needs and tended to buy or build things that were cool as hell, but ultimately never got used too much.
I'd say keep the cash handy and next time you realize that you need something, buy it. The cash seems to work better for you like that.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Jun 27, 2015 9:33:51 GMT -6
Here's what I do.. I keep some money aside for studio needs. When I'm in sessions and find something I need, I get it. I've stopped attempting to guess what I'll need or use in the future, because I've almost always been wrong! I've always had eyes bigger than my needs and tended to buy or build things that were cool as hell, but ultimately never got used too much. I'd say keep the cash handy and next time you realize that you need something, buy it. The cash seems to work better for you like that. The smart man ^^^^^^^ Wise words.
|
|