nas
Full Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by nas on May 25, 2024 10:09:49 GMT -6
I'm considering a 500 series chassis with ADAT (Heritage OST-8 ADAT, Carneborne 500ADAT, etc..).
Do any of you own or have experience with these types of chassis? How is the conversion sound quality?
Reliability and durability ?
Anything you like or don't like ? Feedback and advice much appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on May 25, 2024 14:41:25 GMT -6
I have the Craneborne and like it a lot. gravesnumber9 is the person to ask about how get the best use out of it on this forum most likely. He is who convinced me to get one.
|
|
|
Post by jaba on May 25, 2024 15:14:45 GMT -6
I got the Cranborne ADAT about 10 months ago (via a RME UFX).
It's working great. Conversion sounds really good (better than the RME I'd say) and it does what I had hoped - use the EQs (one which I often chain to a compressor with one switch) when initially setting up a mix, then render those and with a couple quick changes in Cubase, the EQs end up on my 2-buss with a compressor in their inserts. Looking forward to getting more modules but the workflow has been quick and seamless.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on May 26, 2024 11:38:48 GMT -6
I love the Cranborne. Conversion is good, headphone amps are excellent... like really, really good.
The workflow is totally unmatched though which is the main thing. I can't imagine having another 500 series rack. Once you've had the experience of simple ADAT I/O for your 500 series, it's hard to imagine a more complicated analog routing.
But, of course, you also have the analog routing for when a 500 piece is in the middle of the chain.
I'd suggest anyone considering buying should read the manual for the Cranborne. It's well written with good use cases and explanation of how to maximize the routing. As you start visualizing how you can use the ADAT functionality, it really makes the analog only options feel limiting.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on May 26, 2024 13:32:12 GMT -6
I just wish they had an AES option.
|
|
nas
Full Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by nas on May 27, 2024 11:32:00 GMT -6
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I also have a RME UFX+ so knowing that the Cranborne works seamlessly with it - as shown in the Cranbonrne tutorial videos is a big plus. I actually checked the manual out and their YouTube playlist and the versatility and workflow of this unit is really impressive. Probably my only comment would be that it may be a little bit overkill - I don't really need a summing mixer or the headphone capabilities it has as I have that pretty much covered. It's good to know those option are available, but not sure if I want to pay around 500 USD extra for those features compared to the Heritage ADAT chassis when it's functionality I don't really need.
I also read the Heritage manual but I didn't see the same tracking/mixing "flick of a switch" convenience that the Cranborne has... I think you still have to do some re-patching in different (tracking/mixing) modes.
Still, digging both units and will do a little more research on this.
|
|
|
Post by jaba on May 27, 2024 12:28:31 GMT -6
I'm not using the summing on the Cranborne at all. Even the headphone outs is rare.
Think of what it can bring to your workflow, not what it has that you may not use. Unless those extras are driving the cost into no-go territory for you it might still be a great deal if what it does have over a standard 500 chassis is something you'll benefit from.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on May 27, 2024 12:44:13 GMT -6
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I also have a RME UFX+ so knowing that the Cranborne works seamlessly with it - as shown in the Cranbonrne tutorial videos is a big plus. I actually checked the manual out and their YouTube playlist and the versatility and workflow of this unit is really impressive. Probably my only comment would be that it may be a little bit overkill - I don't really need a summing mixer or the headphone capabilities it has as I have that pretty much covered. It's good to know those option are available, but not sure if I want to pay around 500 USD extra for those features compared to the Heritage ADAT chassis when it's functionality I don't really need. I also read the Heritage manual but I didn't see the same tracking/mixing "flick of a switch" convenience that the Cranborne has... I think you still have to do some re-patching in different (tracking/mixing) modes. Still, digging both units and will do a little more research on this. Also worth looking at how the Cranborne C.A.S.T. system works. It's pretty cool, I have a couple of those pieces and they're plug and play all the way. I don't think the Heritage was out when I bought the Cranborne. That's a good option it seems. My vote would be 100% get something with ADAT cuz it's really a game changer for 500 series. And between the Heritage and the Cranborne I like the extra features the Cranborne has (though I don't use the summing either) and I think I'd prefer the design and layout of the Cranborne, but Heritage makes good stuff. I'm sure it's great. I have to say though... the Cranborne conversion is the only time I've ever "heard" conversion and started to believe that it actually matters. I'm still mostly a conversion skeptic (as in "I'm skeptical that it's more than a marginal improvement at this stage of the tech game) but this one moved the needle towards "ok, maybe it still matters a lot."
|
|
nas
Full Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by nas on May 27, 2024 13:02:39 GMT -6
I'm not using the summing on the Cranborne at all. Even the headphone outs is rare. Think of what it can bring to your workflow, not what it has that you may not use. Unless those extras are driving the cost into no-go territory for you it might still be a great deal if what it does have over a standard 500 chassis is something you'll benefit from. Well yes that's it... I'm not sure I want to drop the extra 500 USD for features I won't use. I think 1k USD is already significant for a chassis with ADAT and at the upper end of what I want to pay. If I was convinced of the extra features I would drop the extra coin but as it is now, I would probably allocate that to another module or DIY kit. But still weighing the options... the workflow on the Cranborne may just be worth the price of entry.
|
|
nas
Full Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by nas on May 27, 2024 13:10:26 GMT -6
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I also have a RME UFX+ so knowing that the Cranborne works seamlessly with it - as shown in the Cranbonrne tutorial videos is a big plus. I actually checked the manual out and their YouTube playlist and the versatility and workflow of this unit is really impressive. Probably my only comment would be that it may be a little bit overkill - I don't really need a summing mixer or the headphone capabilities it has as I have that pretty much covered. It's good to know those option are available, but not sure if I want to pay around 500 USD extra for those features compared to the Heritage ADAT chassis when it's functionality I don't really need. I also read the Heritage manual but I didn't see the same tracking/mixing "flick of a switch" convenience that the Cranborne has... I think you still have to do some re-patching in different (tracking/mixing) modes. Still, digging both units and will do a little more research on this. Also worth looking at how the Cranborne C.A.S.T. system works. It's pretty cool, I have a couple of those pieces and they're plug and play all the way. I don't think the Heritage was out when I bought the Cranborne. That's a good option it seems. My vote would be 100% get something with ADAT cuz it's really a game changer for 500 series. And between the Heritage and the Cranborne I like the extra features the Cranborne has (though I don't use the summing either) and I think I'd prefer the design and layout of the Cranborne, but Heritage makes good stuff. I'm sure it's great. I have to say though... the Cranborne conversion is the only time I've ever "heard" conversion and started to believe that it actually matters. I'm still mostly a conversion skeptic (as in "I'm skeptical that it's more than a marginal improvement at this stage of the tech game) but this one moved the needle towards "ok, maybe it still matters a lot." I believe that both Heritage and Cranborne use the same converters? What struck me though was the clocking on the Cranborne. I think that can provide a significant improvement in sound quality. Just listening to the audio quality on the newer RME Babyface Fs with the improved clocking vs the UFX+ that I have which has the "older" clocking I could definitely hear a difference. Are you using the Cranborne as the Master clock on your system? I would imagine that may play a significant role.
|
|
|
Post by fellowshiphallsound on May 27, 2024 13:21:05 GMT -6
I also read the Heritage manual but I didn't see the same tracking/mixing "flick of a switch" convenience that the Cranborne has... I think you still have to do some re-patching in different (tracking/mixing) modes. Still, digging both units and will do a little more research on this. The Heritage Audio converter is only AD, no DA included, right?
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on May 27, 2024 14:07:46 GMT -6
Also worth looking at how the Cranborne C.A.S.T. system works. It's pretty cool, I have a couple of those pieces and they're plug and play all the way. I don't think the Heritage was out when I bought the Cranborne. That's a good option it seems. My vote would be 100% get something with ADAT cuz it's really a game changer for 500 series. And between the Heritage and the Cranborne I like the extra features the Cranborne has (though I don't use the summing either) and I think I'd prefer the design and layout of the Cranborne, but Heritage makes good stuff. I'm sure it's great. I have to say though... the Cranborne conversion is the only time I've ever "heard" conversion and started to believe that it actually matters. I'm still mostly a conversion skeptic (as in "I'm skeptical that it's more than a marginal improvement at this stage of the tech game) but this one moved the needle towards "ok, maybe it still matters a lot." I believe that both Heritage and Cranborne use the same converters? What struck me though was the clocking on the Cranborne. I think that can provide a significant improvement in sound quality. Just listening to the audio quality on the newer RME Babyface Fs with the improved clocking vs the UFX+ that I have which has the "older" clocking I could definitely hear a difference. Are you using the Cranborne as the Master clock on your system? I would imagine that may play a significant role. I'm not using as master clock although maybe I should. I usually go simplest route there just to avoid screwing myself up so I use the MOTU 828es as master clock. I only vaguely understand how to link all these things together to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by brentbodrug on May 28, 2024 12:43:36 GMT -6
I currently have 2 of the Cranborne racks. I formerly had 2 of the Heritage racks. I really wanted the Heritage racks to work but I could not get them to clock reliably using internal or external clocking. I spoke to a number of people trying to resolve the issue including Heritage but it was never able to be resolved.
Cranborne are first class and working perfectly for me. Highly recommended.
|
|
nas
Full Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by nas on May 28, 2024 12:53:52 GMT -6
I believe that both Heritage and Cranborne use the same converters? What struck me though was the clocking on the Cranborne. I think that can provide a significant improvement in sound quality. Just listening to the audio quality on the newer RME Babyface Fs with the improved clocking vs the UFX+ that I have which has the "older" clocking I could definitely hear a difference. Are you using the Cranborne as the Master clock on your system? I would imagine that may play a significant role. I'm not using as master clock although maybe I should. I usually go simplest route there just to avoid screwing myself up so I use the MOTU 828es as master clock. I only vaguely understand how to link all these things together to be honest. I found this clip on the Cranborne Youtube Channel to be a good tutorial on clocking the units: fellowshiphallsound yes I believe its only ADC no DAC on the Heritage.
|
|
nas
Full Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by nas on May 28, 2024 12:56:04 GMT -6
I currently have 2 of the Cranborne racks. I formerly had 2 of the Heritage racks. I really wanted the Heritage racks to work but I could not get them to clock reliably using internal or external clocking. I spoke to a number of people trying to resolve the issue including Heritage but it was never able to be resolved. Cranborne are first class and working perfectly for me. Highly recommended. Thanks for that info.. it's important to know this.
|
|
|
Post by basspro on May 28, 2024 14:14:53 GMT -6
FWIW I have the Heritage OST-8 and it seems to have issues accepting Word Clock. I'm on my second unit and it has the same issue. To its credit, I think the conversion sounds good and it works fine as the master clock source over Word Clock or ADAT, but I get intermittent clicks and dropouts if I use my Apollo x8 as the master clock source
|
|
|
Post by basspro on May 28, 2024 14:48:08 GMT -6
I currently have 2 of the Cranborne racks. I formerly had 2 of the Heritage racks. I really wanted the Heritage racks to work but I could not get them to clock reliably using internal or external clocking. I spoke to a number of people trying to resolve the issue including Heritage but it was never able to be resolved. Cranborne are first class and working perfectly for me. Highly recommended. Missed this when I first went through the thread. Similar issue here although mine seems to work ok if I use it as the master clock. Can't get it to slave to my Apollo x8 though, unfortunately, which is what I would ultimately like to do.
|
|
|
Post by ontravelling on May 28, 2024 23:57:48 GMT -6
I've used several products from both companies and while heritage stuff is fine, Cranborne is in another league. Currently running a 500R8 and can confirm the clocking is outstanding. Also any time I've needed to contact them the replies are prompt and professional.
|
|
|
Post by prene1 on May 31, 2024 1:01:08 GMT -6
3 of cranborne 500’s here. And I LOVE them.
|
|
|
Post by paulnajar on Jun 5, 2024 5:14:13 GMT -6
3 of the Cranbornes here also connected to an RME adi-648 Madi to 8 x Adat ports which goes back to a UFX 3 now days. It runs at 96Khz most 0f the time and sounds great. The 500 rack power supply is also very good and over spec as are the headphone amps. Very powerful and good sounding. You will want to feed the headphone amps with other analog outs otherwise you will loose access to 500 slots to do this task.
I experimented a lot initially using the summing section but in the end I don’t use it instead when mixing I make good use of Logic’s IO plugin for hardware inserts and use logics digital mix bus for this with other analog on the 2 bus.
I have them all on a patchbay including the inserts. Inserts are unbalanced but this has not been an issue for me interconnecting to other balanced devices. If you don’t use the inserts you end up loosing/ wasting quite a few ad converters needlessly.
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jun 5, 2024 13:41:00 GMT -6
3 of the Cranbornes here also connected to an RME adi-648 Madi to 8 x Adat ports which goes back to a UFX 3 now days. It runs at 96Khz most 0f the time and sounds great. The 500 rack power supply is also very good and over spec as are the headphone amps. Very powerful and good sounding. You will want to feed the headphone amps with other analog outs otherwise you will loose access to 500 slots to do this task. I experimented a lot initially using the summing section but in the end I don’t use it instead when mixing I make good use of Logic’s IO plugin for hardware inserts and use logics digital mix bus for this with other analog on the 2 bus. I have them all on a patchbay including the inserts. Inserts are unbalanced but this has not been an issue for me interconnecting to other balanced devices. If you don’t use the inserts you end up loosing/ wasting quite a few ad converters needlessly. Those RME adi-648 go for pretty cheap used. I've often wondered about ditching my other stuff and adding extra Cranbornes instead. That's a whole lot of ADAT. In theory you wouldn't necessarily need the UFX III, right? If you were only using pre-amps and such from the Cranbornes. Although I suppose (as you point out) you'd lose two 500 slots getting your monitoring signal out.
|
|
|
Post by paulnajar on Jun 5, 2024 15:46:54 GMT -6
Those RME adi-648 go for pretty cheap used. I've often wondered about ditching my other stuff and adding extra Cranbornes instead. That's a whole lot of ADAT. In theory you wouldn't necessarily need the UFX III, right? If you were only using pre-amps and such from the Cranbornes. Although I suppose (as you point out) you'd lose two 500 slots getting your monitoring signal out. I don’t get what you’re thinking about not needing the UFX 3 - or at least a MADI port somewhere. For me the UFX 3 has just replaced a RME Madiface usb. You will definitely need a MADI port interface to connect the adi 648 to computer. I also still have the original UFX as the 4th device on the adi 648 providing analog outs to the headphone amp ins on the 500adat’s so the adi is full. I use the analog IO on the UFX 3 to feed my Atmos speaker system. Before the UFX 3 I used some of the Cranborne outputs for that task as those converters sounded a lot better than the original UFX. Now with UFX 3 my first impression is its converters sound every bit as good as the Cranbornes. It’s only new - less than a week old - so I need to spend more time with them. PS: Could some kind soul please tell me if there’s a way to subscribe to a forum thread here? I’ve been here a few years now and this is the one thing I’ve never been able to figure out. You know, so I get email notifications occasionally when new posts arrive:-) Kind regards
|
|
|
Post by gravesnumber9 on Jun 5, 2024 15:56:48 GMT -6
Those RME adi-648 go for pretty cheap used. I've often wondered about ditching my other stuff and adding extra Cranbornes instead. That's a whole lot of ADAT. In theory you wouldn't necessarily need the UFX III, right? If you were only using pre-amps and such from the Cranbornes. Although I suppose (as you point out) you'd lose two 500 slots getting your monitoring signal out. I don’t get what you’re thinking about not needing the UFX 3 - or at least a MADI port somewhere. For me the UFX 3 has just replaced a RME Madiface usb. You will definitely need a MADI port interface to connect the adi 648 to computer. I also still have the original UFX as the 4th device on the adi 648 providing analog outs to the headphone amp ins on the 500adat’s so the adi is full. I use the analog IO on the UFX 3 to feed my Atmos speaker system. Before the UFX 3 I used some of the Cranborne outputs for that task as those converters sounded a lot better than the original UFX. Now with UFX 3 my first impression is its converters sound every bit as good as the Cranbornes. It’s only new - less than a week old - so I need to spend more time with them. PS: Could some kind soul please tell me if there’s a way to subscribe to a forum thread here? I’ve been here a few years now and this is the one thing I’ve never been able to figure out. You know, so I get email notifications occasionally when new posts arrive:-) Kind regards Oh, I misunderstood the specs on the ADI-648. Didn't realize it didn't interface with the computer. Looking now that seems pretty obvious! Haha. Insert facepalm emoji.
|
|
Ox Han
Junior Member
Posts: 93
|
Post by Ox Han on Jun 6, 2024 7:20:26 GMT -6
The Cranborne 500ADAT is great. I used it with the babyface pro fs and then sold both to get the Cranborne 500R8 to be an all-in-one unit for my needs. No experience with the heritage
FWIW - The nice thing about the 500ADAT is that it can expand a smaller set up for ultra convenience and can still be portable itself
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jun 6, 2024 10:33:13 GMT -6
I just wish they had an AES option. would it really be too much to ask that there be 8 channel 500 series chassis (what's the plural here?) with a simple AES in and out to connect to your converter?
|
|