|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 26, 2024 6:59:20 GMT -6
I'm moving back to Hybrid Mixing for my new album. I already use a stereo mix bus chain (so I guess that counts as I'm currently using 2 channels) - but I'm going to start using Cubase channel inserts to send to my hardware racks. I was reading about the last Neil Finn album and the producer said they only went out of Pro Tools for Neil's lead vocal and the bass. Everything else was ITB! So, I'm a little worried about the amount of recall need and so I'm thinking of striking a balanced approach and coming out for Lead vox Bass snare kick lead (guitar or synth) drum bus So about 8 channels. But then if I add a Wes Audio Titian 500 sereis it has full digital recall and so I could add anouther 10 channels without the worry of recall. So - what's your approach and how many channels do you face recalling for a mix and are you using high end ADA's like Lynx Aurora N? PS I added 64+ to the poll to cover Dr Bill
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Mar 26, 2024 7:46:35 GMT -6
I use a mix bus chain, and I'm happy with that. I consider different approaches from time to time, but I like the expediency and flexibility of just the mix bus compressor and EQ.
I will suggest you get the free Snapshot plugin, which allows you to put photos right into each channel.
|
|
|
Post by doubledog on Mar 26, 2024 7:51:38 GMT -6
I didn't vote since there was no option of "0". 100% ITB.
edit: except for tracking, and sometimes I will use some outboard to process a track, re-amp, etc. but I don't really think of that as mixing. It's pre-mixing. And while I have capability of 16 i/o, I rarely am using more than 2 channels for this kinda stuff.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 26, 2024 8:08:08 GMT -6
I use a mix bus chain, and I'm happy with that. I consider different approaches from time to time, but I like the expediency and flexibility of just the mix bus compressor and EQ. I will suggest you get the free Snapshot plugin, which allows you to put photos right into each channel. This is where I'm currently at. I use a VCA, Vari-Mu, Tube EQ and HEDD 192 FX on my stereo bus. I'm so impressed with the depth and size these pieces add to the mix (over my previous mix bus plugins) that I'm drawn to using hardware on the channels too - like a moth to a flame :-) .... and at a time when engineers like MHB have go to ITB plus hardware on the mix bus. But I'm not a full time famous mix engineer so I have the time to take a more "cottage industry" approach to sound and texture.
|
|
|
Post by bricejchandler on Mar 26, 2024 8:16:05 GMT -6
Last record I did had outboard on:
Lead Vocal Bass Mono drum buss And the Stereo Mix
The previous one
Lead Vocal Bass Stereo guitars Kick Snare and the Stereo Mix
So at most I'm using 8 channels.
The current record I'm working on is for my music, and since I'll be mixing this one at home it'll be probably 100% ITB, but then I'm committing so much before the DAW that there won't be that much to do.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 26, 2024 8:45:53 GMT -6
Last record I did had outboard on: Lead Vocal Bass Mono drum buss And the Stereo Mix The previous one Lead Vocal Bass Stereo guitars Kick Snare and the Stereo Mix So at most I'm using 8 channels. The current record I'm working on is for my music, and since I'll be mixing this one at home it'll be probably 100% ITB, but then I'm committing so much before the DAW that there won't be that much to do. Cool - so that's the sort of approach I'm thinking - about 8 tracks An 8 channel Lynx Aurora N is way more affordable than the 16 or 24 channel version! If I want to have more like 16 or 24 channels then I'm into something like a Ferrorfish A32 Pro and then possible the ADA quailty might suffer?
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Mar 26, 2024 8:45:57 GMT -6
I don't do my own final mixes except for some promo singer/songwriter stuff. But I do rough mix through a Silver Bullet with an AudioScape bus compressor inserted on it. I helps me hear what things will end up sounding like a little better.
|
|
|
Post by bricejchandler on Mar 26, 2024 9:53:40 GMT -6
Last record I did had outboard on: Lead Vocal Bass Mono drum buss And the Stereo Mix The previous one Lead Vocal Bass Stereo guitars Kick Snare and the Stereo Mix So at most I'm using 8 channels. The current record I'm working on is for my music, and since I'll be mixing this one at home it'll be probably 100% ITB, but then I'm committing so much before the DAW that there won't be that much to do. Cool - so that's the sort of approach I'm thinking - about 8 tracks An 8 channel Lynx Aurora N is way more affordable than the 16 or 24 channel version! If I want to have more like 16 or 24 channels then I'm into something like a Ferrorfish A32 Pro and then possible the ADA quailty might suffer? I wouldn't worry about the extra ADA, even going through an average converter, but that's just me, I think the gains of outboard outweigh the possible signal degradation. When I'm mixing Hybrid these days, I only send money tracks through analog gear. Whatever is driving that track is going OTB and then I print those tracks for easy recall. I can't imagine going back to mixing on a big board unless I'm tracking a live band and we're pretty much printing the mixes in real time, which to be honest is still probably the funnest way to work. I'm slowly building a small hybrid setup to be able to process 6/8 channels. I want to keep my setup, small, have everything at my fingertips to be able to work fast!
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Mar 26, 2024 10:11:22 GMT -6
So - what's your approach and how many channels do you face recalling for a mix and are you using high end ADA's like Lynx Aurora N? PS I added 64+ to the poll to cover Dr Bill Thanks for thinking of me. I'm at 120. Mostly AVID HD I/o although I do have one lonely 192 that will get swapped out at some point. I'll probably end up at 128 on the next computer upgrade. I'm already wired for it. That will probably be the last I'll upgrade I/o. Unless I add a third HDX card.... I don't worry about "high end" AD/DA except for my final monitoring stage which is a Grace M905. That made a big difference over my previous monitor controller. It's rare that I'm ever using all of that I/o though. Every output is assigned to a piece of outboard in PT's I/o matrix - so I might be using outputs 1/2, 9, 37, 47/48, 82, etc. It all depends on what pieces I need for any particular mix. There are pieces that ALWAYS get used though. My mixing 2 buss chain is always a Silver Bullet mk2 A>N>4000 or N>A>4000 into ZOD IDDI's - for mixing. The 4 major food groups : API, Neve, SSL and Tube. I used to never use SSL, but somehow the Hitmaker stuff changed that for me. Beyond that things change up as the need arises. For mastering, it's normally Missing Link > Manley Vari-Mu-Mu > Silver Bullet mk2 > Miad LCPQ 4040's > Fabfilter Limiter - although things get changed up as the need arises. Sometimes the Avalon 2055 gets the nod on the EQ front, and sometimes an SSL Bus comp makes it's way in. Either Serpent or AudioScape. I have things set up with the hardware outboard so that recall is pretty simple, but the PTHDX template is fairly complex. I used to be ALL about tweaking stuff (hardware) to get the sound, but the MrFocus modules kind of changed that for me - forcing me into hardware "presets" that either work or don't. If any particular piece of gear doesn't work, I'll move to a different piece(s). If that doesn't work - I have no qualms about using both hardware and software to achieve my goals. For example - I love API 550A's, and I have an EQ preset that just "works" on a lot of stuff : but there are times that it's not "perfectly" EQ'd. So at that point, I'll instantiate a plugin to complete the picture. Barring that - I'm back to a plugin chain to make something work if the hardware doesn't. But it usually does. I've had LFAC (consoles) my entire professional life, and I love them a lot. If I was tracking groups every day I'd still have one. But for mixing, Hybrid has by FAR eclipsed mixing on a big desk for me. Love it so much more, and am so much more creative with this approach. Tons of pics of Blinky lights and stuff on my instagram : drill.mojo Good luck with your setup - and don't let anyone fool you. More is most definitely MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 26, 2024 10:37:33 GMT -6
So - what's your approach and how many channels do you face recalling for a mix and are you using high end ADA's like Lynx Aurora N? PS I added 64+ to the poll to cover Dr Bill Thanks for thinking of me. I'm at 120. Mostly AVID HD I/o although I do have one lonely 192 that will get swapped out at some point. I'll probably end up at 128 on the next computer upgrade. I'm already wired for it. That will probably be the last I'll upgrade I/o. Unless I add a third HDX card.... I don't worry about "high end" AD/DA except for my final monitoring stage which is a Grace M905. That made a big difference over my previous monitor controller. It's rare that I'm ever using all of that I/o though. Every output is assigned to a piece of outboard in PT's I/o matrix - so I might be using outputs 1/2, 9, 37, 47/48, 82, etc. It all depends on what pieces I need for any particular mix. There are pieces that ALWAYS get used though. My mixing 2 buss chain is always a Silver Bullet mk2 A>N>4000 or N>A>4000 into ZOD IDDI's - for mixing. The 4 major food groups : API, Neve, SSL and Tube. I used to never use SSL, but somehow the Hitmaker stuff changed that for me. Beyond that things change up as the need arises. For mastering, it's normally Missing Link > Manley Vari-Mu-Mu > Silver Bullet mk2 > Miad LCPQ 4040's > Fabfilter Limiter - although things get changed up as the need arises. Sometimes the Avalon 2055 gets the nod on the EQ front, and sometimes an SSL Bus comp makes it's way in. Either Serpent or AudioScape. I have things set up with the hardware outboard so that recall is pretty simple, but the PTHDX template is fairly complex. I used to be ALL about tweaking stuff (hardware) to get the sound, but the MrFocus modules kind of changed that for me - forcing me into hardware "presets" that either work or don't. If any particular piece of gear doesn't work, I'll move to a different piece(s). If that doesn't work - I have no qualms about using both hardware and software to achieve my goals. For example - I love API 550A's, and I have an EQ preset that just "works" on a lot of stuff : but there are times that it's not "perfectly" EQ'd. So at that point, I'll instantiate a plugin to complete the picture. Barring that - I'm back to a plugin chain to make something work if the hardware doesn't. But it usually does. I've had LFAC (consoles) my entire professional life, and I love them a lot. If I was tracking groups every day I'd still have one. But for mixing, Hybrid has by FAR eclipsed mixing on a big desk for me. Love it so much more, and am so much more creative with this approach. Tons of pics of Blinky lights and stuff on my instagram : drill.mojo Good luck with your setup - and don't let anyone fool you. More is most definitely MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for all that great info - especially not getting hung up on converters. More is most definitely MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This sounds like an excellent mantra - just not for my wallet
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Mar 26, 2024 10:45:38 GMT -6
Love the DR Bill post! For me and my meager setup..When everything is wired up, I like 12. Sort of like group bussing sent to 1” 8 track with extra options.. drumsLR, LeadVox, guitar LR, leads, bass, everything else LR. I almost always bring kick and snare out on a channel as well, and I also like to capture external reverb back in the DAW so I can get 2 returns of EQ on channels, sometimes I’ll send ITB verbs out. Staying in 8-12 = lots of space open for alternates, instead of having to recall a bunch of stuff, just patch. That way a mixing board with way too many channels at your disposal is actually super handy and not just wasted space. I can have a few songs going.. Then after find the right patching, adjust the pre-outboard plugins ITB the rest of the way for instant recall/client adjusts. Thats how I do hybrid still
|
|
|
Post by smashlord on Mar 26, 2024 12:05:55 GMT -6
While I have the capability to do 14, it usually ends up being 4....drum parallel and the 2 buss. I'd love to use more, but clients can be really slow about revisions, even if I put in my policies they have 72 hours to provide notes to cash in on any included revisions. Also, despite explicitly mentioning in my policies that all FINAL tracks must be present and accounted for before mixing begins and that changing out tracks will result in additional charges, I still will get "oh the bass player decided he wants to put just a couple of phrases" after you hand them a first pass of a mix. I don't expect they would care if I told them using outboard would necessitate going back to square one.
Sometimes there is an additional kick and snare parallel or I may print some things through outboard, but for pragmatic reasons I stay in the box with processing unless its a set it and forget it parallel situation I am mixing into.
I have the occasional client ask for an all-analog mix and they are surprised when I quote them 2x my normal mix fee.
|
|
|
Post by Shadowk on Mar 26, 2024 13:34:22 GMT -6
24 channels for me, 16 is HW and 8 is the SSL Big Six. It covers most of everything..
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Mar 26, 2024 14:30:43 GMT -6
When I had my console and racks of gear…14
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Mar 26, 2024 20:12:27 GMT -6
I max out my 24-ch console and then usually have a few additional channels running parallel or other processing, so I'm using most or all of my 32x32 PT system on most mixes.
|
|
|
Post by geoff738 on Mar 26, 2024 20:23:02 GMT -6
I chose 8. That’s my max i/o but could add a couple more over spdif.So, up to 10.
I am usually a pretty low track count guy, so that’ll do me fine I think.
Cheers, Geoff
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 27, 2024 0:29:37 GMT -6
I max out my 24-ch console and then usually have a few additional channels running parallel or other processing, so I'm using most or all of my 32x32 PT system on most mixes. 24 - console channels - nice. How many hardware inserts are you running with the console? May I ask, what Ada’s are you using? Thanks
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Mar 27, 2024 7:01:01 GMT -6
I max out my 24-ch console and then usually have a few additional channels running parallel or other processing, so I'm using most or all of my 32x32 PT system on most mixes. 24 - console channels - nice. How many hardware inserts are you running with the console? May I ask, what Ada’s are you using? Thanks I route from daw to console (and back) via hardware insert, so typically I’m using a bunch. just using the humble avid io, 32x32, but the stereo mix is printed thru a RND converter
|
|
|
Post by ninworks on Mar 27, 2024 7:23:07 GMT -6
I mix mostly ITB. I'm not using high-end converters. My RME only has 8 channels of I/O but I use a Clarett OctoPre as an ADAT I/O expander so I have 16 channel capability. I have never done a mix using all 16 channels at once. I think the most I have ever done was 6 channels. All the rest was done ITB.
I use hardware for just tracking most of the time. I like using hardware mic pres and EQ on the 2 bus. Other than that it's usually just 2 or 3 channels of hardware compressors on individual tracks. If I had a good hardware 2 buss compressor I would use it too but don't have one. If I had a problem child I might run it through a BT50 but I haven't done that yet. I'm mostly ITB.
|
|
|
Post by robo on Mar 27, 2024 9:54:37 GMT -6
I’m opposite, in that my mix bus is usually ITB, and I process most of the stems OTB. Recall is easy, and I like keeping mixbus processing subtle anyway.
90% of the time vocals and bass go through outboard.
70% of the time drums.
50% guitars/synths/percussion/BV’s.
So anywhere from 2-16 channels of inserts, though usually I print stems once the mix is gelling.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 27, 2024 11:11:18 GMT -6
24 - console channels - nice. How many hardware inserts are you running with the console? May I ask, what Ada’s are you using? Thanks I route from daw to console (and back) via hardware insert, so typically I’m using a bunch. just using the humble avid io, 32x32, but the stereo mix is printed thru a RND converter I'm swaying between a Lynx Aurora N 16x16 or a Ferrofish A32 Pro 32x32. The Ferrofish is about half the the price and twice the number of I/O so I can use half (16) for my inserts and some for my cue mixes etc. I've noticed on this thread, people are using 16+ I/O but aren't obsessing about using super high end converters. I have my HEDD 192 for tracking and my stereo hardware chain and an Avocet for monitoring duties, so I'm thinking the Ferrofish A32 Pro will do just nicely for Cubase inserts. Yes it only has 114dB DR compared to the Lynx's impressive 120dB DR but as I'm inserting mostly tube gear and vintage style solid state gear then the noise floor hard deck is coming from the inserted hardware not the converters.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Mar 27, 2024 11:32:18 GMT -6
I have my HEDD 192 for tracking and my stereo hardware chain and an Avocet for monitoring duties, so I'm thinking the Ferrofish A32 Pro will do just nicely for Cubase inserts. Yes it only has 114dB DR compared to the Lynx's impressive 120dB DR but as I'm inserting mostly tube gear and vintage style solid state gear then the noise floor hard deck is coming from the inserted hardware not the converters. 114dB vs. 120dB is so theoretical that it's not an issue in the real world. That 6dB difference is so far below real world noise floors - especially for analog gear - as to be rendered meaningless in reality. More on point would be how does one "sound" vs. the other.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Mar 27, 2024 12:08:41 GMT -6
24 channels for me, 16 is HW and 8 is the SSL Big Six. It covers most of everything.. It's the... English Channel. Chris
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Mar 27, 2024 12:37:35 GMT -6
2 to 4, usually just mix bus but occasionally it's 2 busses with separate processing and passive summing before a final process. An increasing number of mixes are 'none'.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Mar 27, 2024 12:39:50 GMT -6
I have my HEDD 192 for tracking and my stereo hardware chain and an Avocet for monitoring duties, so I'm thinking the Ferrofish A32 Pro will do just nicely for Cubase inserts. Yes it only has 114dB DR compared to the Lynx's impressive 120dB DR but as I'm inserting mostly tube gear and vintage style solid state gear then the noise floor hard deck is coming from the inserted hardware not the converters. 114dB vs. 120dB is so theoretical that it's not an issue in the real world. That 6dB difference is so far below real world noise floors - especially for analog gear - as to be rendered meaningless in reality. More on point would be how does one "sound" vs. the other. That’s also my thoughts about dynamic range in this particular reference of use. How one sounds against the other will be a case of my asking someone with each model to run a file in a loop through them.
|
|