|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2024 17:08:07 GMT -6
Problem is, maybe I'm the strange one...
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2024 17:09:22 GMT -6
And I've tried to commit a lot of what Dan said to memory After seeing that video, I'm not sure it was Dan that said that.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2024 17:13:18 GMT -6
OMG...were Dan and Shadowk the same person?
|
|
|
Post by noob on Feb 9, 2024 17:15:03 GMT -6
OMG...were Dan and Shadowk the same person?
|
|
|
Post by enlav on Feb 9, 2024 17:22:32 GMT -6
But Dan was using settings I never used. These insanely fast attack times. For all I know he had completely different taste and goals from me. Bold emphasis mine: While I haven't preserved the discussions in notes, one thing Dan has mentioned in the analysis of both hardware and software was the issue with compressors allowing overs. I don't remember the aforementioned settings, but going for the fastest attack times might have been related with the "overs" observations. Based on some of the more recent posts, I'd venture your thought here is on the money.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2024 17:29:48 GMT -6
It was always about saturation and "nuking" stuff - which I have to be honest - I didn't really get...I chalked it up to him being in a completely different genre. But it's making more sense what aliasing was such a big topic for him - he was putting distortion on everything...
BTW - I'm not disparaging him...it's just making more sense.
|
|
|
Post by viciousbliss on Feb 9, 2024 18:29:51 GMT -6
It was always about saturation and "nuking" stuff - which I have to be honest - I didn't really get...I chalked it up to him being in a completely different genre. But it's making more sense what aliasing was such a big topic for him - he was putting distortion on everything... BTW - I'm not disparaging him...it's just making more sense. Does anyone remember if Dan ever went into detail on his plugin chains? I'd love to know how many plugins he was using per session. A lot of plugins have a lot of problems and it will definitely pile up if you're using dozens of things that are introducing stuff like aliasing and phase issues.
|
|
|
Post by Bat Lanyard on Feb 9, 2024 18:53:10 GMT -6
OMG...were Dan and Shadowk the same person? I would say no. I remember a Christmas Zoom back in the day where Dan was on and then a ShadowK Zoom from one of his last-minute posts where he was on. Two totally different looking people.
|
|
|
Post by geoff738 on Feb 9, 2024 19:18:06 GMT -6
I guess I’ve never been clear what exactly I am supposed to be listening for when it comes to aliasing. And how obvious is it in a real world application as opposed to a sine sweep. My ears are old at this point so I’m sure there are fairly attenuated highs, and the low end in one ear is also messed up. So, I suppose in theory I should be somewhat aware of it and where it might most make its presence known, but in practice I dunno.
Cheers, Geoff
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2024 19:24:07 GMT -6
Don’t know if this is always aliasing, but when the top end like cymbals sound metallic or you hear crunchiness in top end…or whistling.
|
|
|
Post by robo on Feb 9, 2024 19:54:27 GMT -6
A list of plugins that alias would be helpful, honestly. Like the guy showed with the Helios example (which is supposedly upsampled)...it still aliases after cranking the pre over 40db. IMO, the Helios is the best sounding software emu UA does...and I've never used it over 40db I don't think. Wonder what Drew would say about that? I'm a little scared of getting yelled at lol. I think all compression and saturation plugins alias to some degree. Evan Kelvin on “pristine” mode. It only becomes a problem if it creeps into the audible range. If the aliasing is 100dB below your peaks it’s pretty inconsequential. It also matters a lot more on harmonic instruments than it does on drums, since drums are already mostly blasts of inharmonic noise. From other people’s tests I can tell you Soundtoys stuff is pretty bad, and benefits a lot from oversampling.
|
|
|
Post by jampa on Feb 9, 2024 20:00:50 GMT -6
So a couple of questions: Is aliasing one of the main reasons we prefer HW over SW? How can you ensure that you're preventing it? If a plugin has an in-built low pass filter (preferably one that auto-adjusts to your sampling rate, and also is close to its Nyquist frequency), then it will (heavily) attenuate frequencies that would otherwise appear on the other side of your Nyquist frequency i.e., it reduces aliasing To get a feel for what aliasing is adding to your sound, I suggest finding a plugin that aliases (I use plugin doctor and it would easily do this), prepare something like an acoustic guitar track in your DAW, and then use that plugin and drive it really hard Then see if you care about it or not Personally I do, and the plugins I use (and how I use them [generally in regards to gain-staging]) reflect this
|
|
|
Post by jampa on Feb 9, 2024 20:06:23 GMT -6
Bonus post
This is much like gain-staging your pre-amps for desired (or undesired) harmonic content. But what about how much harmonic content you are getting out of your microphone? (most relevant to tube mics) Do you move it further back from the source to purposefully achieve less distortion? Abbey Road used to use noise-guns on their microphones to inform this decision making
Also,
there is a mega thread on gearspace regarding plugin analysis - particularly aliasing. It's is called "Lets do it: The Ultimate Plugin Analysis Thread" and worth a skim through if interested in this sort of thing
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,048
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 9, 2024 20:23:48 GMT -6
When you’re a stranger, people seem ugly, when you’re alone.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,048
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 9, 2024 20:27:29 GMT -6
It was always about saturation and "nuking" stuff - which I have to be honest - I didn't really get...I chalked it up to him being in a completely different genre. But it's making more sense what aliasing was such a big topic for him - he was putting distortion on everything... BTW - I'm not disparaging him...it's just making more sense. Does anyone remember if Dan ever went into detail on his plugin chains? I'd love to know how many plugins he was using per session. A lot of plugins have a lot of problems and it will definitely pile up if you're using dozens of things that are introducing stuff like aliasing and phase issues. Never, in a way, all his comments/criticisms were abstractions. I’m not saying invalid, but at least I post shit from time to time. If all this isn’t actually about trying to improve our recording chops: what the fuck are we doing here ?
|
|
|
Post by bgrotto on Feb 9, 2024 21:44:32 GMT -6
Is aliasing a large part of the reason we think HW sounds better than SW? I would say a possibly better way to think about it is *nyquist* is a large part of the reason we think HW sounds better than SW. Aliasing is just one of the symptoms of the larger issue here. Inadequate sample rate will, yes, result in aliasing in certain cases, but it also affects attack (and to a lesser extent, release) times of dynamics tools, it can cause cramping in the HF of equalization tools, and so on. I myself am of the mind that aliasing in and of itself is something of an overstated problem; though it is often inaudible, lots of great sounding records 'suffer' from some measurable degree of it. But it didn't stop a great sounding record from happening. On the other hand, the root cause of the aliasing -- inadequate sample rate -- can cause far more troubling sonic issues. Remember the Bomb Factory plugins...? Or think about that weird 'clack' that happens when you tried to set the compressors of yesteryear to ultra-fast attack times. Yuck. Way more crummy sounding than a bit of aliasing living at like -80db, IMO. That said, we have the CPU power to easily minimize aliasing and other nyquist-related problems, so I'm very much in favor of programmers who take that prerogative.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 9, 2024 22:47:58 GMT -6
I'm still confused a bit. Lets say I wanted to just have HP and LP filters on the first insert of every channel. I roll them at 35hz and say 15khz. Does that plugin need to be oversampled? Or does the hi cut make that moot? Then - when you add any other plugs - they should all be oversampled...or do they not need to be because the top is high passed?
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Feb 9, 2024 23:58:23 GMT -6
I'm still confused a bit. Lets say I wanted to just have HP and LP filters on the first insert of every channel. I roll them at 35hz and say 15khz. Does that plugin need to be oversampled? Or does the hi cut make that moot? Then - when you add any other plugs - they should all be oversampled...or do they not need to be because the top is high passed? Well, if the session is at 1x rates (44.1 or 48kHz), and you use something like a saturation plugin after that first EQ plugin you mentioned, and especially if the saturation plugin in question doesn't oversample, it could still cause some aliasing.
I moved over to using 2x rates a couple/few years ago, and this type of scenario was one of the reasons. (There are obviously legit reasons either way to go with 1x or 2x rates...)
|
|
|
Post by jampa on Feb 10, 2024 0:05:19 GMT -6
I'm still confused a bit. Lets say I wanted to just have HP and LP filters on the first insert of every channel. I roll them at 35hz and say 15khz. Does that plugin need to be oversampled? Or does the hi cut make that moot? Then - when you add any other plugs - they should all be oversampled...or do they not need to be because the top is high passed? For the HP and LP filters - no. Most EQ plugins are clean. But let's say they were not clean eqs - well the low pass filter is already attenuating any frequencies that would extend past Nyquist, so the aliasing is virtually gone Note every single plugin in a chain can alias. Ideally, plugins that create harmonic material should either allow for oversampling (pushing the Nyquist frequency way up, so that any harmonics then do not reflect off the original Nyquist, or if they do, then are very low in amplitude), or should have a low pass filter built into them (which attenuates the frequencies that would reflect) This is one reason why I work at 96k. I can use plugins that have steep low pass filters up near 48kHz, which screws with the phase up there, but then my final product is 44.1kHz, and I just cut all that bent phase material out Let's take a bad case for aliasing: plugin one is driven hard and creates harmonics and also creates aliased material. Then plugin two is driven hard creates harmonics and aliased material, which includes harmonics of plugin one's aliased material, and aliases of plugin one's aliased material. Plugin three compounds this further, and so on. This could end up as mush, creating heaps of signal that is actually unrelated to the original sound A picture or a sound example here would make it a lot clearer than words
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 10, 2024 0:11:40 GMT -6
I'm still confused a bit. Lets say I wanted to just have HP and LP filters on the first insert of every channel. I roll them at 35hz and say 15khz. Does that plugin need to be oversampled? Or does the hi cut make that moot? Then - when you add any other plugs - they should all be oversampled...or do they not need to be because the top is high passed? Well, if the session is at 1x rates (44.1 or 48kHz), and you use something like a saturation plugin after that first EQ plugin you mentioned, and especially if the saturation plugin in question doesn't oversample, it could still cause some aliasing.
I moved over to using 2x rates a couple/few years ago, and this type of scenario was one of the reasons. (There are obviously legit reasons either way to go with 1x or 2x rates...)
Yeah. That’s the most convincing reason I’ve heard so far. Always thought Plugins did/do “sound better” in higher sample rates, I just thought it was for naught by the time you bounced it down…but that’s old thinking…
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 12, 2024 10:18:04 GMT -6
The “under the hood” stuff is interesting to a point, but there’s basically no correlation between knowing a lot about how plugins work and making great records. And by far, the trend is that plugins are getting better and better. So WTF? It’s like an obsession. This. I used to care so much about how everything worked. I absolutely believed that knowing it would allow me to make the right choices and jump over my peers in my work. The truth is, that it consumed me and my time to the point where I'd spend more time dicking around with settings, parts, A/B tests and whatever else instead of just working. I'm dead serious. I'd spend a day in the studio messing around with all this stuff instead of actually doing something like mixing the song. Then I'd be so spent that I couldn't hear it straight anymore. Honestly, one day I was watching mixing videos and there was a Q&A where the mixer was asked about choosing this plugin over that plugin and he simply said "I don't care, I just used this because I had it and now I know it so well that I'm not going to change" and that was a lightbulb moment for me and reset my whole studio world. They didn't really care about the under-the-hood stuff at all. They wanted an effect/affect and some plugin or piece of gear supplied it and that was that. Just slap it on and keep going. No achingly detailed testing or consulting the internet.. Just put it on, adjust it and keep going. It's like a weight has been lifted and I feel like I'm doing the best work I've ever done.
|
|
|
Post by ragan on Feb 12, 2024 10:41:50 GMT -6
The “under the hood” stuff is interesting to a point, but there’s basically no correlation between knowing a lot about how plugins work and making great records. And by far, the trend is that plugins are getting better and better. So WTF? It’s like an obsession. This. I used to care so much about how everything worked. I absolutely believed that knowing it would allow me to make the right choices and jump over my peers in my work.  The truth is, that it consumed me and my time to the point where I'd spend more time dicking around with settings, parts, A/B tests and whatever else instead of just working. I'm dead serious. I'd spend a day in the studio messing around with all this stuff instead of actually doing something like mixing the song. Then I'd be so spent that I couldn't hear it straight anymore. Honestly, one day I was watching mixing videos and there was a Q&A where the mixer was asked about choosing this plugin over that plugin and he simply said "I don't care, I just used this because I had it and now I know it so well that I'm not going to change" and that was a lightbulb moment for me and reset my whole studio world.  They didn't really care about the under-the-hood stuff at all. They wanted an effect/affect and some plugin or piece of gear supplied it and that was that. Just slap it on and keep going. No achingly detailed testing or consulting the internet.. Just put it on, adjust it and keep going. It's like a weight has been lifted and I feel like I'm doing the best work I've ever done. TESTIFY!
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 12, 2024 11:15:37 GMT -6
All of pro audio is just my procrastination from writing songs.
|
|
|
Post by ragan on Feb 12, 2024 11:58:50 GMT -6
I think of it as a parallel passion. I love the Beatles song, but I also love the sonics. Been chasing both passions forever. Sometimes they work together and HELP! each other out, sometimes they’re at odds and hinder each other.
|
|
|
Post by Shadowk on Feb 12, 2024 12:06:09 GMT -6
The “under the hood” stuff is interesting to a point, but there’s basically no correlation between knowing a lot about how plugins work and making great records. And by far, the trend is that plugins are getting better and better. So WTF? It’s like an obsession. This. I used to care so much about how everything worked. I absolutely believed that knowing it would allow me to make the right choices and jump over my peers in my work. The truth is, that it consumed me and my time to the point where I'd spend more time dicking around with settings, parts, A/B tests and whatever else instead of just working. I'm dead serious. I'd spend a day in the studio messing around with all this stuff instead of actually doing something like mixing the song. Then I'd be so spent that I couldn't hear it straight anymore. Honestly, one day I was watching mixing videos and there was a Q&A where the mixer was asked about choosing this plugin over that plugin and he simply said "I don't care, I just used this because I had it and now I know it so well that I'm not going to change" and that was a lightbulb moment for me and reset my whole studio world. They didn't really care about the under-the-hood stuff at all. They wanted an effect/affect and some plugin or piece of gear supplied it and that was that. Just slap it on and keep going. No achingly detailed testing or consulting the internet.. Just put it on, adjust it and keep going. It's like a weight has been lifted and I feel like I'm doing the best work I've ever done. Nod's, exactly what you said..
|
|