Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2023 0:15:52 GMT -6
I've had a svart moment. So, decades ago I poured a lot of energy into a demo and I've always had a bit of hangup about it. Somebody said in a not so polite way that it's crap but nobody would ever tell me why. Of course I blamed the recording and mix due to my complete inexperience plus the fact that I recorded it with an SM58 / Digi Mbox , I then mixed it with UA plugs (that was about the time they were first released), I also blamed the vocals because I'm originally a guitarist and it wasn't at the time my forte.
With the help of Martin I finally understand and it's odd because I can't believe that it didn't sink in before. Besides the horribly fake sounding drums which couldn't be helped there's nothing really wrong with it but there's nothing really good about it either. The mix / recording and mastering is technically competent (enough), nothing to shout about but for the time a decent effort and certainly not the worst I've heard compared to some "pro metal". The vocals were technically competent enough, the musicianship is technically competent enough..
You get the picture? Despite trying to be extremely different layering light pop vocals over an extreme metal backing track it somehow manages to be the most boring yet weird composition ever made. It reflects in the mix as well, there's no variety, no real arrangement and I even sound bored whilst singing it. That actually was partially a production issue as with my voice a dynamic or darker sounding mic was never a good idea but that's irrelevant to the point. So the arrangement / songwriting destroyed that track and that's why ultimately it sucked..
But, over the years I've been working on my mixing / mastering chops, gaining tons of equipment etc. and besides from a better drum VST and a condenser it probably wasn't all that necessary. Don't get me wrong I love my hardware, it does add something to the equation but ultimately it's neither here nor there. Yes, derp and all that but hindsight is a beautiful thing.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 1, 2023 0:58:17 GMT -6
I think what you’re saying is that it all basically comes down to the song and performance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2023 1:12:19 GMT -6
I think what you’re saying is that it all basically comes down to the song and performance. That's one element but it all matters. There's plenty of tracks utterly ruined by the recording / mix and master, I don't believe there's any stage that doesn't count.
My internal point was for me at least was it's too easy to get hung up on the wrong things.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Feb 1, 2023 1:33:03 GMT -6
For me it comes down to the …. Arrangement. If I’m proudest of any of the musical and technical skills I have develop of the last 41 years since I turned pro as a musician it’s I’m a darn fine arranger. The presentation of a song is everything. Listen to the two recordings of Joni Mitchell’s “Both Sides Now” First recorded by Judy Collins and presented as a 60 ‘s vibe “pop” song. And the Mitchell’s version on her superb “Clouds” album presented as a beautiful ballad with haunting strings and Smokey jazz vocals. I use this as an example when teaching students arranging. Judy Collins version does nothing for me - I feel nothing. Mitchell’s version is possibly my favourite ever song and can move me to tears. Arrangement, it’s THE most critical element of a recording and performance. I have a little saying. All Art Makes a Statement. So everything you do, every little element, every decision is making a statement about you, your song, your production, your art. It’s so obvious yet sometimes it gets hidden in clear view. Another arranging tip. Careful about going down a dead end when the excitement about the arrangement (as a thing in its own right) throws the song out of the window. I was working on an arrangement of a new song (and it’s a very good song) and I got into this big Bollywood arrangement thing, big strings - fancy percussion. My wife walks into the studio and say “what are doing to that song!” her outside perspective snapped me out of my arrangement hypnosis and I stepped back. I thought ok what would Eric Clapton do on this track and I reached for a nylon string guitar and started again with a lovely little “simple” dotted quaver rhythm and “boom” perfection. It was yet another “Both sides Now” moment. Find the perfect arrangement and tracking, performing and mixing will be like falling off a log
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 1, 2023 2:48:56 GMT -6
Its interesting, engaging ?, how the arrangement speaks to us as well ?
I wonder the extent to which, peeps who don’t write songs appreciate that? I say that respectfully.
Those of us who start with the first snippet of lyric, melody, guitar line in our heads at 3 in the morning or whenever, know the song within the arrangement differently. I write now, what I think of as the base song with its structural arrangement and record that and use logic’s arrangement line to create different iterations of the structural arrangement to taste and to experiment with how this affects or serves the song.
Our daws are powerful tools.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Feb 1, 2023 3:56:20 GMT -6
Its interesting, engaging ?, how the arrangement speaks to us as well ? I wonder the extent to which, peeps who don’t write songs appreciate that? I say that respectfully. Those of us who start with the first snippet of lyric, melody, guitar line in our heads at 3 in the morning or whenever, know the song within the arrangement differently. I write now, what I think of as the base song with its structural arrangement and record that and use logic’s arrangement line to create different iterations of the structural arrangement to taste and to experiment with how this affects or serves the song. Our daws are powerful tools. I once read about a producer who was working on a Sting album and he said the production team of about 20 people all has ipods and on those ipods was 40 different verisons of every song on the album. In total they had 65 hours of music recorded for one 10 track album! I mean yep that's the way to do it, and as the saying goes "the rich get richer" so we can't all afford that level of creative output. It's the reason an album takes me several years to produce (partly because I also have to work as a musician to earn money) but also because the first 6 months is writing the 12 tracks and the next year is arranging them in many different musical settings with a lot of time spent experimenting and then 6 months tracking, editing and mixing. I'm a bit OCD about this stuff and I can't leave a stone unturned - the road less travelled and all that - I have to get to the single universal truth of each song. Whether people like them or not is a totally different point
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 1, 2023 4:30:12 GMT -6
I hear you; I am very binary as I manipulate the song structure; quick yes no decision but also in logic you can save alternatives of the session so again you can keep different arrangements a session click away to check. structure, flow etc !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2023 6:05:34 GMT -6
It's the reason an album takes me several years to produce (partly because I also have to work as a musician to earn money) but also because the first 6 months is writing the 12 tracks and the next year is arranging them in many different musical settings with a lot of time spent experimenting and then 6 months tracking, editing and mixing. Well, it's good to know I'm not the only one taking this slowly. I did rush that demo and it didn't pay off, this time around I'll take my sweet time and do it right. For example if fake drums don't work I'll hire someone with a kit / good mic's to mimic the song. I mean we put all this money into equipment but it doesn't matter if the source isn't the best it can be.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Feb 1, 2023 6:25:57 GMT -6
It's the reason an album takes me several years to produce (partly because I also have to work as a musician to earn money) but also because the first 6 months is writing the 12 tracks and the next year is arranging them in many different musical settings with a lot of time spent experimenting and then 6 months tracking, editing and mixing. Well, it's good to know I'm not the only one taking this slowly. I did rush that demo and it didn't pay off, this time around I'll take my sweet time and do it right. For example if fake drums don't work I'll hire someone with a kit / good mic's to mimic the song. I mean we put all this money into equipment but it doesn't matter if the source isn't the best it can be. My "fake" drums played in from my TD-50x triggering SD3 libraries honestly don't sound fake, just extremely well recorded drums - which is what they are. It's the player that counts. If I can find a spare moment, I'll post a clip to show you what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Feb 1, 2023 6:28:32 GMT -6
I hear you; I am very binary as I manipulate the song structure; quick yes no decision but also in logic you can save alternatives of the session so again you can keep different arrangements a session click away to check. structure, flow etc ! But I don't mean just traditional structure variations. Do you try the Reggae version, the Country Rock version, the EDM version, the Rock version the Pop version, the jazzy version, the 6/8 version the 3/4 version :-) Ok in truth I don't try an EDM version (that's not my scene) but you get the idea. These days I can listen to some of these variations in my head which is of course quicker, but I have to get in the sand pit and play and make castles I never know where the truth lays. But you're 100% correct having a DAW is fantastic for quick trying out ideas.
|
|
|
Post by kcatthedog on Feb 1, 2023 6:59:01 GMT -6
I am just talking about rearranging the major song components, verse, chorus, etc., not its musical style.
I track and record in all the subsequent musical parts.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Feb 1, 2023 7:23:18 GMT -6
I am just talking about rearranging the major song components, verse, chorus, etc., not its musical style. I track and record in all the subsequent musical parts. Yes, DAW's are great for that. Cubase, like Logic, has an arranger track that let's you try stuff on the fly.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Feb 1, 2023 7:56:42 GMT -6
It all matters, but when you get hung up on one aspect of a whole array of things that need to be right for success, none of it will work.
The proverbial "if you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail".
So as a gear buff, every problem with my mixes must've been "the gear". It was never good enough or I never had the right piece...
But I can also see the opposite in some folks, where they believe the gear doesn't matter at all. I knew a guy who was great at writing songs but he was recording everything on some 99$ presonus box and his songs sounded so muddled and bland that they were almost unlistenable. He was worried that he didn't write good material when it was a matter of the gear making it hard to listen to.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Feb 1, 2023 10:42:40 GMT -6
The only people who pay for quality of recording over song and performance are audiophiles and while the will pay far more than the average consumer the act see’s very very little.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Feb 1, 2023 13:17:56 GMT -6
It takes experience to know how to use the tools and what their limits are. We can now use a bagful of 58s and make a killer record. But we’d know things like how to make a fig8 or MS recording out of them, and how to use reflections as room reverb, where to pan them and how to EQ them etc. And a big one is we know that a transformer preamp being pushed brings some harmonics that will help a lot more than a cheap interface preamp going through some plugins. If we have to use interface pre, we know which plugin to try to get a similar tone, and how to gain stage. There’s just so many challenges new engineers face. And I’ve spent so much time messing around with newer home artists, there is always always something irreparably messed up. I truly believe the few success stories out there are just random chance due to numbers lol.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Feb 1, 2023 13:33:50 GMT -6
I think what you’re saying is that it all basically comes down to the song and performance. The only people who pay for quality of recording over song and performance are audiophiles and while the will pay far more than the average consumer the act see’s very very little. The above two replies are all the honest and common sense/advice you'll ever need. It's the song first!! Then it's the delivery of the song. The delivery is the vocal. The vehicle is the music under the vocal. Everything else is varying degrees of spit and polish. We should all make records in 4-8 weeks and be done with them. Most of the great records in the classic era from 65-92 were done like this. It can be done. And never be afraid to bin a song if it just doesn't work.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Feb 1, 2023 13:58:07 GMT -6
It takes experience to know how to use the tools and what their limits are.. This. ^^^. It's painfully obvious by many (most?) of the examples put up on the internet used to judge equipment. Great gear does not make great mixes. In fact, if I were using mixes to determine how useful specific pieces of gear are, I'd have been avoiding many beloved pieces I own. LOL I know I am still learning and hope that folks don't judge the gear I use by my mixes.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Feb 1, 2023 14:00:30 GMT -6
Then it's the delivery of the song. The delivery is the vocal.Sorry Ward. Shortsighted. What about instrumental music? Pure music IS instrumental music.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Feb 1, 2023 14:09:05 GMT -6
LMAO a5 drbill! OK, fine. God knows instrumental music has certainly paid for a lot of my life and kids' "higher" education.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Feb 1, 2023 14:13:22 GMT -6
LMAO a5 drbill ! OK, fine. God knows instrumental music has certainly paid for a lot of my life and kids' "higher" education. No worries bro. Just trying to keep it real. Haha!!! Instrumental music has to stand on it's own without lyrics. It's the true artistic musical experience. . LOL (Of course, 95+ % of the music I write has been instrumental and put my kids thru their *lower* education as well).
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Feb 1, 2023 14:16:07 GMT -6
LMAO... quality!
|
|
|
Post by gwlee7 on Feb 1, 2023 15:00:50 GMT -6
Stopid Equipment. Keeping me from being rich and famous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2023 15:34:24 GMT -6
This is why truly clean is better. Don't fuck it up. I only use colour to salvage crap, compress distorted guitars, or to make it better or add texture to different things to make it pop. If something is recorded well, it often has all the vibe it needs. the worship of the distorted past is ridiculous when most things weren't overdriven to hell and there wasn't 10 1176s on the drum kit. and a guy who is whisper to scream like Kurt Cobain or Andrew Eldritch? How the hell do the classics (aka the 1176/dbx 160/la2a/ssl/fairchild/emi because that's what the corporation overlords want to market ad infinitum because the r&d was done 40-70 years ago) work and sound right? THEY DON'T without heavy editing and fader rides. Dual threshold modern vca and digital compressors? THEY JUST NAIL IT AND MAKE IT SIT. Even better players? JUST NAIL IT. Hardly any automation needed.
It's all about the song. Bands who don't keep time whose most popular records sound like absolute dreck even though they paid money for them became legends. Like Emperor which we've talked about TheShadowK. If you want to cover them, you better listen to half a dozen live shows and pick the most in time recording of the song. On the records? THey just played together and went with the emotional takes. And it sounds great with the WTF? productions (never anything close to normal or "commercial" aka FAKED metal) and reverbs and later in the 90s, THE HORRID arrangements they don't even bother playing live, the ridiculous photo shoots, be damned. It just didn't matter. Only the music did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2023 22:19:21 GMT -6
It takes experience to know how to use the tools and what their limits are. Well, does it? The mix, master wasn't the issue here. At the time I'd overcompensated due to awareness of my lack of experience and wouldn't let it go until it at least competed or beat other tracks in my playlist. That was a mistake, in hindsight I'd rather the song be decent as opposed to technically correct. It's almost like I was so focussed on the production that I forgot about the songs themselves. I know my experience is probably opposite to most, many have better songs but struggle with the mixing side. Although over the years I've seen people cyclically go round in a loop of equipment hoping that it'll make enough difference to fix the performance and arrangement (I was one of them) which it never will. What makes this even more odd is years later when I was doing on location or field engineering I used all sorts of crap and if I didn't do a good job with said equipment I wouldn't have been paid. So no, having an SM58 direct to interface isn't much of an issue in the grand scheme. I realised later that I very much suit 251 or C800 style mic's and yes, my word the Core 59's, Shelford's, racks of 500's, modern plugins and high end condensers make my life considerably easier and I've developed a style to my mixes decades on. That's cool but it's a benefit not a necessity..
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Feb 1, 2023 22:49:27 GMT -6
Stopid Equipment. Keeping me from being rich and famous. With all of your RGO friends, you are a rich man already! And I consider you famous. So there's that.
|
|