|
Post by OtisGreying on Aug 13, 2020 22:32:17 GMT -6
When you think of tracking on a console the signal ends up passing through many sets of amps and transformers, much more than a given single preamp would contain, so having just purchased a BAE 1073 and Avedis MA5 I've been experimenting how to get myself the most analog/transformer color while tracking considering these are my primary analog pieces. Today I tried tracking with my Flea 47 plugged into my Avedis MA5, then daisy chaining going into my BAE 73 set to Line, the result being very nice to my hear. An analog sizzle/bite in the upper mids that felt like it was really helping focus the vocal. Have any of you guys experimented with this?
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Aug 13, 2020 22:41:21 GMT -6
Have any of you guys experimented with this? Constantly. I don't just experiment with it - I birthed the idea and then co-created a product designed to fix part of the problem of modern recording - i.e too pure a signal path. As someone who lived in the classic era of consoles and tape machines, I realize just how MANY analog gain stages a signal goes thru (old school) before it was "mixed". A great mic pre into a compressor into your DAW doesn't get it. You need a lot more. I've been preaching this for a decade. It's the concept that birthed the Silver Bullet, then Chroma, and then the Mr.Focus Stage II which creates that second stage of a console design. Those still don't get you all the way, but that's their focus (sorry for the pun), and employing all of them generously throughout the production process gets you a lot closer to the sound of classic records. It takes a lot of gain stages (some might call it degradation?) to get you to the non-linearities of the old school records.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Aug 13, 2020 22:41:23 GMT -6
I have an older Century Crest console that was modded and has Jensen transformers throughout. It sounds like a record when I use my outboard preamps going into the line input of this board. It really sounds good. Seems like the hotter I hit it, the more I like it. I can get that grit and bounce(Almost like compression when I hit it hard)
|
|
|
Post by OtisGreying on Aug 13, 2020 23:25:28 GMT -6
Have any of you guys experimented with this? Constantly. I don't just experiment with it - I birthed the idea and then co-created a product designed to fix part of the problem of modern recording - i.e too pure a signal path. As someone who lived in the classic era of consoles and tape machines, I realize just how MANY analog gain stages a signal goes thru (old school) before it was "mixed". A great mic pre into a compressor into your DAW doesn't get it. You need a lot more. I've been preaching this for a decade. It's the concept that birthed the Silver Bullet, then Chroma, and then the Mr.Focus Stage II which creates that second stage of a console design. Those still don't get you all the way, but that's their focus (sorry for the pun), and employing all of them generously throughout the production process gets you a lot closer to the sound of classic records. It takes a lot of gain stages (some might call it degradation?) to get you to the non-linearities of the old school records. I had a very enlightening conversation with Avedis from Avedis Audio about this today, he really lifted the veil over my eyes. The circuitry and transformers really are the holy grail sound IMO. Tracking with a board going through all those gain stages I'm sure tracks come out near finished and need very very little mixing. This is what I'm slowly figuring out. I used to think it was all about compression and EQ. Ha! Realizing how much well built analog circuitry during tracking accounts for the sound I've been searching for is pretty astonishing!
|
|
|
Post by Michael O. on Aug 14, 2020 0:02:55 GMT -6
I experiment with adding or omitting different line amps or buffers in the signal chain pretty regularly, and, while I wouldn’t call it a night and day difference, one can certainly get subtly different tones and timbres by using and abusing those additional amps.
For instance, with my console (a Trident TSM, a sort of discrete/transformer and ic opamp hybrid) there is a subtle but distinct difference in sound whether you take signal from the dedicated channel direct outs or from the insert send. Taking signal from the insert send bypasses the output fader line amp and a couple buffer stages, and the resultant signal is decidedly a bit cleaner/truer to the source, as you’d probably intuit. Not universally better or worse, but different, and just the right thing for some applications.
Another example is how a 1073-alike line/mic/eq module sounds subtly different setup with the complementary output line amp (as it would in a console) than without it. A less subtle example would be to say throw an 1176 or 1178 in linear mode (i.e. attack clicked off) into the signal chain- noticeable additional harmonics, change in timbre, yadda yadda.
One final thing to consider with all this is that not only is any hypothetical line amp circuitry adding its own bit of distortion and whatnot, it also quite likely has a different output impedance than whatever piece of gear is feeding it, and that different output impedance in relation to the input impedance of the next piece of gear in the signal chain will have an effect on the overall sound, however subtle or dramatic.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Aug 14, 2020 0:37:31 GMT -6
I experiment with adding or omitting different line amps or buffers in the signal chain pretty regularly, and, while I wouldn’t call it a night and day difference, one can certainly get subtly different tones and timbres by using and abusing those additional amps. For instance, with my console (a Trident TSM, a sort of discrete/transformer and ic opamp hybrid) there is a subtle but distinct difference in sound whether you take signal from the dedicated channel direct outs or from the insert send. Taking signal from the insert send bypasses the output fader line amp and a couple buffer stages, and the resultant signal is decidedly a bit cleaner/truer to the source, as you’d probably intuit. Not universally better or worse, but different, and just the right thing for some applications. Another example is how a 1073-alike line/mic/eq module sounds subtly different setup with the complementary output line amp (as it would in a console) than without it. A less subtle example would be to say throw an 1176 or 1178 in linear mode (i.e. attack clicked off) into the signal chain- noticeable additional harmonics, change in timbre, yadda yadda. One final thing to consider with all this is that not only is any hypothetical line amp circuitry adding its own bit of distortion and whatnot, it also quite likely has a different output impedance than whatever piece of gear is feeding it, and that different output impedance in relation to the input impedance of the next piece of gear in the signal chain will have an effect on the overall sound, however subtle or dramatic. nice first post! Welcome!
|
|
|
Post by OtisGreying on Aug 16, 2020 4:02:05 GMT -6
Have any of you guys experimented with this? Constantly. I don't just experiment with it - I birthed the idea and then co-created a product designed to fix part of the problem of modern recording - i.e too pure a signal path. As someone who lived in the classic era of consoles and tape machines, I realize just how MANY analog gain stages a signal goes thru (old school) before it was "mixed". A great mic pre into a compressor into your DAW doesn't get it. You need a lot more. I've been preaching this for a decade. It's the concept that birthed the Silver Bullet, then Chroma, and then the Mr.Focus Stage II which creates that second stage of a console design. Those still don't get you all the way, but that's their focus (sorry for the pun), and employing all of them generously throughout the production process gets you a lot closer to the sound of classic records. It takes a lot of gain stages (some might call it degradation?) to get you to the non-linearities of the old school records. drBill, I'm contemplating possibly buying a BAE 73MP dedicated to master bus running mixes through in LINE mode or used as makeup gain with a Folcrom/passive summer.. Just trying to introduce more transformers within the signal path/mixdown What would you recommend for master buss to get more of that transformer/console depth? The Silver Bullet peaks my interest but I wonder if it would introduce enough transformer color as the 2 BAE‘s in line mode/makeup gain for my mixes. The Chroma + has enough space for 2 transformers within the module spaces but doesn’t seem like master bus processing is really it’s intended purpose, but I’m no expert.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 16, 2020 10:30:57 GMT -6
Constantly. I don't just experiment with it - I birthed the idea and then co-created a product designed to fix part of the problem of modern recording - i.e too pure a signal path. As someone who lived in the classic era of consoles and tape machines, I realize just how MANY analog gain stages a signal goes thru (old school) before it was "mixed". A great mic pre into a compressor into your DAW doesn't get it. You need a lot more. I've been preaching this for a decade. It's the concept that birthed the Silver Bullet, then Chroma, and then the Mr.Focus Stage II which creates that second stage of a console design. Those still don't get you all the way, but that's their focus (sorry for the pun), and employing all of them generously throughout the production process gets you a lot closer to the sound of classic records. It takes a lot of gain stages (some might call it degradation?) to get you to the non-linearities of the old school records. drBill, I'm contemplating possibly buying a BAE 73MP dedicated to master bus running mixes through in LINE mode or used as makeup gain with a Folcrom/passive summer.. Just trying to introduce more transformers within the signal path/mixdown What would you recommend for master buss to get more of that transformer/console depth? The Silver Bullet peaks my interest but I wonder if it would introduce enough transformer color as the 2 BAE‘s in line mode/makeup gain for my mixes. The Chroma + has enough space for 2 transformers within the module spaces but doesn’t seem like master bus processing is really it’s intended purpose, but I’m no expert. Silver Bullet would pass through just as many transformer stages as the BAE when using A and N modes, I believe. But with the difference that the SB is designed to drive those stages into each other and change their sequence etc. Pretty cool. That said, I do what you are describing: after my bus comp the signal goes line in to a pair of 1073 clones with the inputs up pretty high and the outputs backed off.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 16, 2020 10:47:32 GMT -6
Most 1073 clones use an interstage fader to trim, so the distortion in that case is from driving the amplifiers vs saturating the transformer.
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Aug 16, 2020 11:13:38 GMT -6
Constantly. I don't just experiment with it - I birthed the idea and then co-created a product designed to fix part of the problem of modern recording - i.e too pure a signal path. As someone who lived in the classic era of consoles and tape machines, I realize just how MANY analog gain stages a signal goes thru (old school) before it was "mixed". A great mic pre into a compressor into your DAW doesn't get it. You need a lot more. I've been preaching this for a decade. It's the concept that birthed the Silver Bullet, then Chroma, and then the Mr.Focus Stage II which creates that second stage of a console design. Those still don't get you all the way, but that's their focus (sorry for the pun), and employing all of them generously throughout the production process gets you a lot closer to the sound of classic records. It takes a lot of gain stages (some might call it degradation?) to get you to the non-linearities of the old school records. drBill, I'm contemplating possibly buying a BAE 73MP dedicated to master bus running mixes through in LINE mode or used as makeup gain with a Folcrom/passive summer.. Just trying to introduce more transformers within the signal path/mixdown What would you recommend for master buss to get more of that transformer/console depth? The Silver Bullet peaks my interest but I wonder if it would introduce enough transformer color as the 2 BAE‘s in line mode/makeup gain for my mixes. The Chroma + has enough space for 2 transformers within the module spaces but doesn’t seem like master bus processing is really it’s intended purpose, but I’m no expert. Hi Otis. All I can tell you is that the Silver Bullet was created after attempting to do exactly what you want to do. I had two AML1073's, two CAPI vp28's, two CAPI Missing Links and two Eisen LilPEQr's with Marinair transformers (that's 18 transformers in the stereo path) essentially doing what the Silver Bullet does. It was clunky, awkward, I couldn't gain stage the way I wanted, and when I wanted to experiment, it wasn't elegant and easily configurable. Hence the search that ended up being the Silver Bullet. The SB is more than just cascading transformers and line amps and EQ's though. We did some things differently in the SB. You will not get completely there with your proposed method, as we have some proprietary goodness built in that is not public knowledge, and although there is most definitely API and NEVE inside, the way we got there is actually interesting and quite unique. That said, you method will almost certainly be better than nothing on your mix buss. Good luck on your search.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Aug 16, 2020 11:39:40 GMT -6
Have any of you guys experimented with this? Constantly. I don't just experiment with it - I birthed the idea and then co-created a product designed to fix part of the problem of modern recording - i.e too pure a signal path. As someone who lived in the classic era of consoles and tape machines, I realize just how MANY analog gain stages a signal goes thru (old school) before it was "mixed". A great mic pre into a compressor into your DAW doesn't get it. You need a lot more. I've been preaching this for a decade. It's the concept that birthed the Silver Bullet, then Chroma, and then the Mr.Focus Stage II which creates that second stage of a console design. Those still don't get you all the way, but that's their focus (sorry for the pun), and employing all of them generously throughout the production process gets you a lot closer to the sound of classic records. It takes a lot of gain stages (some might call it degradation?) to get you to the non-linearities of the old school records.
Yessss I can underline this, because Bill is a great mentor on those things. Since my signals see many layers of artifacts micpre compression console and often some hardware tube harmonics in parallel than some tape this goes to the analog mixbus that goes in mastering analog again sometimes with tape sometimes not.... artifacts over artifacts.
And sometimes I have the feel I don't make the signals better, I make it sound bad, and I love it.🙏
I would buy an SB if had to start out again with hardware. It would be my first piece.....
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 16, 2020 14:27:00 GMT -6
Most 1073 clones use an interstage fader to trim, so the distortion in that case is from driving the amplifiers vs saturating the transformer. Well you can do a bit of both coming fairly hot out of the previous stage, no?
|
|
|
Post by theglow on Aug 16, 2020 14:29:51 GMT -6
I have an older Century Crest console that was modded and has Jensen transformers throughout. It sounds like a record when I use my outboard preamps going into the line input of this board. It really sounds good. Seems like the hotter I hit it, the more I like it. I can get that grit and bounce(Almost like compression when I hit it hard) This is interesting because I also use a Crest Century console (modded with Jim Williams preamp chips and Jensen transformation on some of the channels) and for the longest time I ran my outboard preamps (CAPI/Electrodyne/Avedis/Etc.) into the INSERT to bypass the extra amp stage (as most people say you should do), but when I decided to start running them through the line inputs to gain access to the excellent highpass filters, I found that it sounded much more “finished” to me, even on the channels I don’t have the Jensons on... just the extra amp stage, even at the lowest gain, contours things in a pleasant way. Not only that, but now I can actually use the insert points to add more transformer/tube gear to the chain, as the lords intended.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 16, 2020 15:10:50 GMT -6
Most 1073 clones use an interstage fader to trim, so the distortion in that case is from driving the amplifiers vs saturating the transformer. Well you can do a bit of both coming fairly hot out of the previous stage, no? 1073 doesn’t have an interstage transformer. It’s mic input -> (stage 1) -> stage 2 -> fader or EQ -> stage 3 -> output transformer Stage 1 kicks in for the highest gain needs. Or line input -> stage 2 -> fader or EQ -> stage 3 -> output transformer. If you’re driving the thing hard and pulling back, on most of the clones you’re lowering the level before the third stage, so the saturation is the driving of amp stage 2.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 16, 2020 15:27:24 GMT -6
Yes, makes sense.
But I’m asking about hitting the line input transformer hard as I have two different gain-stages from other boxes in series before the 73 clones. As you suggest, driving stage 2 is likely a big part of the sound I’m liking.
Also, if Brad were here I imagine he’d say that transformer saturation is just part of the SB story and the thread was about color in general.
Hope that doesn’t sound prickly, I am interested in your thoughts as a designer.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 16, 2020 15:39:52 GMT -6
No worries, I don’t know how much tone you can get out of the line input transformer itself. It’d be interesting to see, maybe by inserting it with an adjustable pad before and after so you can vary the level in the transformer but keep the signal level in and out the same.
I suspect the distortion from the transistors is going to swamp the iron - but I’m not sure!
If we really wanted to have fun, set up the gains with metering and interstage trimmers between each stage and after the transformer. Then you’d really be able to see what’s what. 🤪
|
|
|
Post by drbill on Aug 16, 2020 15:47:37 GMT -6
Also, if Brad were here I imagine he’d say that transformer saturation is just part of the SB story. Since Brad and I designed the SB together, and we've talked for literally hundreds of hours about this very topic, I'd feel very confident to say that he would say "yes". It's only part of the story. The other parts are proprietary, and some of them run against common belief and what some designers might design towards. It's (the SB that is) a unique beast. We've both very proud of it.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 16, 2020 17:49:48 GMT -6
No worries, I don’t know how much tone you can get out of the line input transformer itself. It’d be interesting to see, maybe by inserting it with an adjustable pad before and after so you can vary the level in the transformer but keep the signal level in and out the same. I suspect the distortion from the transistors is going to swamp the iron - but I’m not sure! If we really wanted to have fun, set up the gains with metering and interstage trimmers between each stage and after the transformer. Then you’d really be able to see what’s what. 🤪 My anecdotal experience is that affordable line level transformers sound quite good and I’ve heard people characterize them as easier to make affordably without sonic compromises. Wonder then, if they inherently impart less color due to their low ratio? Or is that not how it works. The SPL summing mixer has a pair of Lundahls you can switch in and out, I always prefer them in, but given that brands rep it’s not surprising that the differences are musical but also subtle.
|
|
|
Post by OtisGreying on Aug 16, 2020 23:56:21 GMT -6
No worries, I don’t know how much tone you can get out of the line input transformer itself. It’d be interesting to see, maybe by inserting it with an adjustable pad before and after so you can vary the level in the transformer but keep the signal level in and out the same. I suspect the distortion from the transistors is going to swamp the iron - but I’m not sure! If we really wanted to have fun, set up the gains with metering and interstage trimmers between each stage and after the transformer. Then you’d really be able to see what’s what. 🤪 My anecdotal experience is that affordable line level transformers sound quite good and I’ve heard people characterize them as easier to make affordably without sonic compromises. Wonder then, if they inherently impart less color due to their low ratio? Or is that not how it works. The SPL summing mixer has a pair of Lundahls you can switch in and out, I always prefer them in, but given that brands rep it’s not surprising that the differences are musical but also subtle. notneeson, do you use a Silver Bullet in your record making? Also, do you use a passive/analog summer before sending your mixes through to the 73's or just use line on the 73s with ITB summing? One more question, are you able to mix into this setup and actively monitor with the preamp color live on your mixes as your mixing?
|
|
|
Post by OtisGreying on Aug 17, 2020 0:07:54 GMT -6
Hi Otis. All I can tell you is that the Silver Bullet was created after attempting to do exactly what you want to do. I had two AML1073's, two CAPI vp28's, two CAPI Missing Links and two Eisen LilPEQr's with Marinair transformers (that's 18 transformers in the stereo path) essentially doing what the Silver Bullet does. It was clunky, awkward, I couldn't gain stage the way I wanted, and when I wanted to experiment, it wasn't elegant and easily configurable. Hence the search that ended up being the Silver Bullet. The SB is more than just cascading transformers and line amps and EQ's though. We did some things differently in the SB. You will not get completely there with your proposed method, as we have some proprietary goodness built in that is not public knowledge, and although there is most definitely API and NEVE inside, the way we got there is actually interesting and quite unique. That said, you method will almost certainly be better than nothing on your mix buss. Good luck on your search. drbill, the SB is a serious contender, as I continue researching the LTL line it looks like the Focus Stage 2 is a must have for tracking. As far as giving me the most high quality analog transformer color for the buck across my entire mix, the Chroma + looks so interesting because of the analog module slot, so more transformer stages than SB it would appear. I feel it would be more versatile a piece but the SB being a dedicated stereo unit, I assume (although I'm not completely sure why) the SB would be better for mix buss purposes.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 17, 2020 5:51:33 GMT -6
Sounds like all of you all really miss the sound of tape overload, to me.
Maybe I do too. Might explain why I'm always using two compressors (with in/out transformers) in my signal chain.
I often look over at the tape deck and say "thank you for your service, soldier."
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Aug 17, 2020 8:03:20 GMT -6
My anecdotal experience is that affordable line level transformers sound quite good and I’ve heard people characterize them as easier to make affordably without sonic compromises. Wonder then, if they inherently impart less color due to their low ratio? Or is that not how it works. The SPL summing mixer has a pair of Lundahls you can switch in and out, I always prefer them in, but given that brands rep it’s not surprising that the differences are musical but also subtle. Well, transformers are going to have a sound and a frequency response, just cuz they are physical components in the signal path. But a quality transformer won’t have much of either. Consider a Jensen-11P doesn’t hit 1% THD until +19dBu - and even then, that’s only at 20Hz! Likely inaudible. THD isn’t everything, at any rate - transient response will change, and frequency. But by +19dBu the active circuitry in the Neve will be screaming. Common feedback we get on our transformer box (The Portia Street Stomp) is that it’s more subtle than people expect. And that’s a steel core, low inductance design, intentionally manipulated with pots to give more sound.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 17, 2020 8:26:06 GMT -6
My anecdotal experience is that affordable line level transformers sound quite good and I’ve heard people characterize them as easier to make affordably without sonic compromises. Wonder then, if they inherently impart less color due to their low ratio? Or is that not how it works. The SPL summing mixer has a pair of Lundahls you can switch in and out, I always prefer them in, but given that brands rep it’s not surprising that the differences are musical but also subtle. notneeson, do you use a Silver Bullet in your record making? Also, do you use a passive/analog summer before sending your mixes through to the 73's or just use line on the 73s with ITB summing? One more question, are you able to mix into this setup and actively monitor with the preamp color live on your mixes as your mixing? I don’t have an SB, but I’ve spent some time with Brad and heard it in action/tried it out. On my own rig I use an active summing amp (D-Box) but it doesn’t have much of a sound on its own. I take that line level output and send it to my bus comp and then the 73 clones. And yes, I monitor in real time listening to the output of the 73s printed back to PT and then AES out to the D-box. In short, the main reason I have the d-box is monitoring flexibility, less so the summing.
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Aug 17, 2020 8:31:55 GMT -6
notneeson, do you use a Silver Bullet in your record making? Also, do you use a passive/analog summer before sending your mixes through to the 73's or just use line on the 73s with ITB summing? One more question, are you able to mix into this setup and actively monitor with the preamp color live on your mixes as your mixing? I don’t have an SB, but I’ve spent some time with Brad and heard it in action/tried it out. On my own rig I use an active summing amp (D-Box) but it doesn’t have much of a sound on its own. I take that line level output and send it to my bus comp and then the 73 clones. And yes, I monitor in real time listening to the output of the 73s printed back to PT and then AES out to the D-box. In short, the main reason I have the d-box is monitoring flexibility, less so the summing. Same here - do you have the newer one or the older silver faced version. I traded up to the newer one and the extra features and slight sonic upgrade were welcomed.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Aug 17, 2020 8:34:21 GMT -6
I don’t have an SB, but I’ve spent some time with Brad and heard it in action/tried it out. On my own rig I use an active summing amp (D-Box) but it doesn’t have much of a sound on its own. I take that line level output and send it to my bus comp and then the 73 clones. And yes, I monitor in real time listening to the output of the 73s printed back to PT and then AES out to the D-box. In short, the main reason I have the d-box is monitoring flexibility, less so the summing. Same here - do you have the newer one or the older silver faced version. I traded up to the newer one and the extra features and slight sonic upgrade were welcomed. I have the old one, I can imagine their new stuff is great though.
|
|