|
|
Post by drumhead57 on Mar 13, 2019 21:25:06 GMT -6
What ever happened to the thread Josh was going to update weekly? I think John deleted it? |
|
|
|
Post by stormymondays on Mar 14, 2019 2:20:00 GMT -6
After being told by Marcelo that my SA-67s "should be ready this week" last weekend, I now get an updated email (thank you, Marcelo) telling me that it will be "another 10 days". I don't want to cancel my order, but it's getting close. Mine was ready “next week” back in August. I canceled my order a long time ago, of course. |
|
|
|
Post by drumhead57 on Mar 14, 2019 2:25:18 GMT -6
After being told by Marcelo that my SA-67s "should be ready this week" last weekend, I now get an updated email (thank you, Marcelo) telling me that it will be "another 10 days". I don't want to cancel my order, but it's getting close. Mine was ready “next week” back in August. I canceled my order a long time ago, of course. I assume that you had no problem getting your money back then. |
|
|
|
Post by stormymondays on Mar 14, 2019 2:40:58 GMT -6
Mine was ready “next week” back in August. I canceled my order a long time ago, of course. I assume that you had no problem getting your money back then. It does take a LOT of emails, like everything with them. |
|
|
|
Post by drumhead57 on Mar 14, 2019 2:44:28 GMT -6
Well, that's certainly encouraging.
|
|
|
|
Post by stam on Mar 14, 2019 5:40:29 GMT -6
Martin's shipped today I believe and few more forum members are receiving theirs this week
Looking forward to the reviews!
|
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Mar 14, 2019 6:13:10 GMT -6
Hey Martin John Butler, let me know when you get it. I’d love to bring my BLUE out there and hear them side by side.  |
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Mar 14, 2019 8:30:50 GMT -6
Can't wait to get started with it Vincent. Of course you're welcome to come by. I saved some tracks done with some great mics that I'll compare to. I'm also planning on doing a comparison at a world class studio. I've tried enough mics to know they're more sensitive to personal compatibility than any other recording tool.
So what I'm really looking for is if it makes me sing better. Many very good mics don't do that, the Chandler REDD did, the vintage U67 at Jeremy's studio did, the Soyuz 0-17 did, and I'm hoping the SA67 does too.
Big thanks to Joshua for making this happen, the U67 is a complicated build and does take some time to get right I'm sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by iamasound on Mar 14, 2019 8:47:45 GMT -6
I just had to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Mar 14, 2019 12:47:45 GMT -6
Can't wait to get started with it Vincent. Of course you're welcome to come by. I saved some tracks done with some great mics that I'll compare to. I'm also planning on doing a comparison at a world class studio. I've tried enough mics to know they're more sensitive to personal compatibility than any other recording tool. So what I'm really looking for is if it makes me sing better. Many very good mics don't do that, the Chandler REDD did, the vintage U67 at Jeremy's studio did, the Soyuz 0-17 did, and I'm hoping the SA67 does too. Big thanks to Joshua for making this happen, the U67 is a complicated build and does take some time to get right I'm sure. I’m interested to hear your thoughts or hear you do a take of the track you did a take of when I brought the MK67 over. |
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Mar 14, 2019 13:28:16 GMT -6
I've got those files buried somewhere. I've forgotten which track we used, but I'll figure it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by peterhess on Mar 14, 2019 17:07:12 GMT -6
I got the “will ship Monday” email reply about 3 weeks ago and now radio silence, no invoice, no email. Ordered Dec 26 ‘16. How does that line up with some of you folks’s impending orders?
|
|
|
|
Post by drumhead57 on Mar 14, 2019 17:14:39 GMT -6
I ordered mine in August, '18 and have been getting consistent emails and updates. No invoice yet, however.
|
|
|
|
Post by stam on Mar 15, 2019 7:03:09 GMT -6
both of you kindly email me at stamaudio@gmail.com so we can get this sorted
It is mayhem down here with emails, orders, back orders, work
But we can do this
|
|
|
|
Post by drumhead57 on Mar 15, 2019 7:37:43 GMT -6
Email just sent. Thanks stam |
|
|
|
Post by drumhead57 on Mar 15, 2019 8:20:15 GMT -6
stam when can I expect an invoice?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Mar 15, 2019 9:04:34 GMT -6
I've got those files buried somewhere. I've forgotten which track we used, but I'll figure it out. I’ll check in a little bit. Pretty sure I have the files in my Dropbox still. |
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Mar 15, 2019 12:48:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by peterhess on Mar 15, 2019 19:18:47 GMT -6
I emailed you too, thanks Josh.
|
|
|
|
Post by hadaja on Mar 15, 2019 23:26:38 GMT -6
My Dany Buchard 251 has a way bigger bottom end on it then my Stam SA-67. Is that normal for a 67? I also have a Beesneez C12 and a Tim Campbell Capsule C12 and they too all have a bigger bottom end and a more focused sound then the Stam My Stam has a wider Cardioid pattern on it so it has the potential for being very good as a room mic. I have not spent much time with it yet.
But if you get up close to the sa-67 the Porximity Effect really comes in to play. The SA-67 is a mic that you have to position yourself with a little more care. It certainly picks up more sound around you so now I will have to focus a little more on my poor room acoustics.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Mar 16, 2019 6:01:04 GMT -6
My Dany Buchard 251 has a way bigger bottom end on it then my Stam SA-67. Is that normal for a 67? I also have a Beesneez C12 and a Tim Campbell Capsule C12 and they too all have a bigger bottom end and a more focused sound then the Stam My Stam has a wider Cardioid pattern on it so it has the potential for being very good as a room mic. I have not spent much time with it yet.
But if you get up close to the sa-67 the Porximity Effect really comes in to play. The SA-67 is a mic that you have to position yourself with a little more care. It certainly picks up more sound around you so now I will have to focus a little more on my poor room acoustics.
One of the big design features of the U67 is that it was designed for close miking, so you need to get closer to get that proximity. Not sure if the 251 should have more bottom end than the 67 though. The 251 usually has a roll off at 100hz. I know Bock’s does not have this and some other builders I know do not do this in their designs to get something slightly warmer than the original design. Not sure about Dany’s. The 67 usually has a very nice low end extension, but it’s neutral and very even sounding. Also not sure if you’re using an AC701k. That tube has a big low end reach and shimmery top end. |
|
|
|
Post by stam on Mar 16, 2019 18:30:27 GMT -6
What tube is in your 67?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Mar 16, 2019 19:25:34 GMT -6
Important point. The tube makes a huge difference! |
|
|
|
Post by hadaja on Mar 17, 2019 0:52:56 GMT -6
I will get backto this tomorrow and find out. Cheers
|
|
|
|
Post by hadaja on Mar 19, 2019 0:14:19 GMT -6
Stam Okay the Tube is Diamond Telefunken with a white numbers stamped on the other side saying: U6202304 Does this mean anything? |
|
