|
Post by c0rtland on Jun 2, 2017 13:09:17 GMT -6
Anyone using this? I bought it and have been using it to clean up some tracks. It's really unbelievable I have to be careful with it. It definitely can get dangerous. But when it works it is magical. I had a guitar track that clipped the pre on two transients. Didn't sound pretty. I used the declip algo. My jaw dropped. Completely worth every penny. It does sooooo much too I have only just scratched the surface.
|
|
|
Post by EmRR on Jun 2, 2017 13:11:48 GMT -6
I have 5, it can be a life saver. I don't find anything about the interface intuitive, that's the downside to me. If you were a forensics guy and lived in it all the time it'd star to make sense, but when I only visit it every now and then, it's hard to navigate.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 2, 2017 18:40:57 GMT -6
How does the Deesser work? I'm always searching for the magic deeser.
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Jun 2, 2017 18:43:20 GMT -6
How does the Deesser work? I'm always searching for the magic deeser. I have been using the Eosis one, in the slate bundle.. but dialing it back to about 10-12% and it seems to be doing the job well. cheers Wiz
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jun 2, 2017 18:45:08 GMT -6
I couldn't wrap my head around the Eosis one (at least quickly)...I still use the Fabfilter Pro-DS and that seems to work well.
|
|
|
Post by jampa on Jun 2, 2017 18:51:09 GMT -6
I have RX 3. I use it mainly for the same reasons - on distortion or random noises. Also for its resampling (downsampling in my case).
Preferred it to all others I tried at the time which was maybe 3 years ago.
Yes you can do a whole lot more with RX, no I haven't spent the time learning it (and probably haven't the need either).
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Jun 2, 2017 21:46:54 GMT -6
The de-esser sounds really good but has a lot of cpu overhead and the settings are critical. I think the best way to use it is with audiosuite.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2017 6:41:51 GMT -6
I have RX6 now (I started out with RX3). It's such a flexible tool that each of us could rely on completely different parts of it. Because I do location work, there are always environmental noises: air-conditioning, outside traffic, too-loud footsteps, coughs and so on. The steady-state stuff (like HVAC) is pretty easy to eliminate. The rest of it takes more time--sometimes a lot of it--but you can work wonders with it. It does chew up a lot of CPU time, but it's worth waiting for.
A interesting, semi-related note. I recorded a string quartet a couple of months ago. It was in a gallery in downtown Salt Lake. I recorded at 192K. It went to RX6 for cleanup. For a large part of the recording, I could see a fairly strong signal at 60 KHz (the RX display is really cool). It was an obvious control signal of some sort--looked almost like slow Morse code. I suppose I could have spent some time with it and extracted a binary pattern. Such a high-frequency signal was way out of any human's hearing range, so it could have been alien bats or something ;-) . Still, I wonder what it was. I have seen cases in which a badly-controlled clock (computer, interface, etc) can generate a signal. But those signals look a lot different (I brought up a lot of hardware in my Lexicon days, so I've seen most of the bad stuff that can happen). Also this was in a setup I use a lot and it's never shown up in any other recording.
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Jun 3, 2017 7:00:10 GMT -6
How does the Deesser work? I'm always searching for the magic deeser. I have been using the Eosis one, in the slate bundle.. but dialing it back to about 10-12% and it seems to be doing the job well. cheers Wiz Between Eosis and Soothe I'm finding I can tame things reasonably. Sometimes I find myself using a little of both.
|
|
|
Post by c0rtland on Jun 3, 2017 8:14:23 GMT -6
The one thing I can't figure out is how to de bleed from multiple mics. If I have theb3 mics with bleed in the and the bleed source track open in rx6 I need to do a composite view of the microphone tracks. Well when I do that it adds the source track to the composite. Does anyone know how to select just the pertinent files in composite and leave extraneous files out?
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Jul 1, 2017 7:25:17 GMT -6
I'm confused regarding what you get for your money.. Elements: $130 Standard: $400 Advanced: $1200 In above video, the demonstrator works on a spectral screen with all kinds of functionality on the right of the GUI. Is that only in the "Advanced" version? I downloaded the free trial I got a bunch of these.. I couldn't get the De-noise to do what I wanted (get rid of some air during a guitar tail). I may not have given it enough of a chance, there are a lot of variables I don't quite understand, BUT I spent at least half an hour with De-click going through all of the options (there are not that many), and couldn't get it to find and fix what should have been an easy mark. I'm inclined to say that no spectral image makes these much more difficult to work with, and certainly not worth it for $400. Things is, on their web-site, I see images for the Standard version that seem to include composite spectral images. This appears to be misleading.
|
|
|
Post by c0rtland on Jul 1, 2017 9:01:38 GMT -6
I'm confused regarding what you get for your money.. Elements: $130 Standard: $400 Advanced: $1200 In above video, the demonstrator works on a spectral screen with all kinds of functionality on the right of the GUI. Is that only in the "Advanced" version? I downloaded the free trial I got a bunch of these.. I couldn't get the De-noise to do what I wanted (get rid of some air during a guitar tail). I may not have given it enough of a chance, there are a lot of variables I don't quite understand, BUT I spent at least half an hour with De-click going through all of the options (there are not that many), and couldn't get it to find and fix what should have been an easy mark. I'm inclined to say that no spectral image makes these much more difficult to work with, and certainly not worth it for $400. Things is, on their web-site, I see images for the Standard version that seem to include composite spectral images. This appears to be misleading. I see you are using logic. Read up on using rx6 as an external file editor. That is required. you are only seeing the plugins currently in logic. That is only part of the software.
|
|
|
Post by M57 on Jul 1, 2017 9:38:08 GMT -6
I see you are using logic. Read up on using rx6 as an external file editor. That is required. you are only seeing the plugins currently in logic. That is only part of the software. Thanks, I did see that one of the "plugins" would even work other than externally.
|
|
|
Post by c0rtland on Jul 1, 2017 10:12:25 GMT -6
I see you are using logic. Read up on using rx6 as an external file editor. That is required. you are only seeing the plugins currently in logic. That is only part of the software. Thanks, I did see that one of the "plugins" would even work other than externally. Also, as far as the denoise algorithm goes I find that waves usually does what I want better than rx6. However, some of the algorithms in rx6 do things that I don't have another solution for, and they do it very well. For me it hasn't been the silver bullet for every issue it addresses. Sometimes it's great, othertimes it just doesn't cut it. That being said I have not mastered the software by any means yet so some of my issues are probably user related.
|
|
|
Post by junior on Jul 1, 2017 11:43:49 GMT -6
Love RX, but also use some of the Acon Digital plugs. Nice simple interface and reasonably priced compared to Izotope. The DeVerberate plug saved my butt a few times.
|
|