|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 16, 2017 12:44:22 GMT -6
Looks like the coupon is still valid from the link. I'm just wondering if I'll REALLY use this. I get really annoyed when I don't know how to use something...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2017 20:32:59 GMT -6
Just did a quick recording of acoustic and then in Cubase. There does seem to be a little more clarity on top...They're two different takes, so take that for what it's worth. Well...maybe... The great difference is what you feel and hear at mixing time. Of course, the sonic fingerprint from recording with the channels print adds up, but there is plenty nice saturation when remixing with the EQs, their dynamics and the freaking great filters. I even like the tape emu very much, it is perfectly sitting in the busses and just adds that little extra that might make the vocal bus sit, or gives bass and drum bus the extra saturation when you drive it hard. The speed of your mixing can seriously raise if you learned mixing on analog console or as a live engineer. You can work intuitively and therefore much faster, it is much harder to make it sound bad in comparison to classic clean digital DAW. But it's much easier to make it sound good. Don't think about saturation plugins etc., just work with what you have right at the fingertips and only add external stuff if they are really needed. I guess speed is a good argument for professionals. Time is money. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2017 20:40:13 GMT -6
Looks like the coupon is still valid from the link. I'm just wondering if I'll REALLY use this. I get really annoyed when I don't know how to use something... Did you pull the trigger or are you still ambiguous? Just curious. If you don't like the editing style, you still can use your preferred DAW for that and import the tracks for the sound shaping. Actually, coming into the Ardour DAW style was easier for me than coming *back* to Cubase. Tried that and gave up. And i had in mind that i really liked it....long ago.... |
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Feb 17, 2017 20:38:34 GMT -6
Man, I just know I won't learn a new daw...I'll keep the demo and see if I can drag something in it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2017 20:56:23 GMT -6
Ah. i see.
Yes. this for sure was not the last attractive offer, Harrison is quite generous with such occasions.
Always better to try something in detail without any time pressure. I don't know, how many different DAWs i tried out or learned since the nineties, and often i scratched my head about how to do the simplest tasks...
In the end, i get behind the logic of the UI (if you can even call it like this) most of the time, to at least do what i need. I know, i had a hard time with Logic but found it nice, once i got it, but it's long ago (Version 5 on Win) and the hardest time was when i tried to get back into Cubase not too long ago, i cancelled this, after i got very frustrated that i did not manage to create a simple VI track from scratch without manual reading...
Most probably, there are preferences and frustration moments possible for everyone. At the moment i feel ok to work with 2 DAWs in parallel and slowly switch to Mixbus with more and more tasks...
|
|
|
|
Post by ChaseUTB on Feb 18, 2017 3:20:26 GMT -6
Man, I just know I won't learn a new daw...I'll keep the demo and see if I can drag something in it And honestly that is why I haven't jumped on the studio one 3 pro cross grade yet. I currently use PT Ableton Live WaveLab FL Studio GarageBand I feel like if I can't accomplish what I need to in these DAWs I am the issue not the daws |
|
|
|
Post by keymod on Feb 18, 2017 5:01:54 GMT -6
Is this current version working well with UAD Plugins? Also, how is the supposed Harrison Mixbus Controller coming along? Since I record mostly to RADAR, Mixbus is very attractive for mixdown.
|
|
